The greatest irony... People who are mostly opposed men wearing skirts (priests of Orthodox, catholic, Muslim clergy) are men wearing skirts all their lives.
* whispers * they mean more regular skirts as most of those you named wear those dresses for religions purposes not just because they want to wear a skirt for the sake of gender equality
Kid is wearing a dress. And when you think of it... Everyone wears something under the dress. Pantyhose, sweats, thigh high socks and panties or even pants. There are probably more men out there right now wearing skirts (in Scotland, Oceania, Thailand) AND dresses with nothing underneath it than women ... So, what's the difference? And there are millions of men wearing dress over pants/panties/high socks/shortses
Oh I was just pointing out your examples were mainly of those who wear dresses and skirts as a religious thing, which is vastly different than wearing them just cause. I don't see an issue with it I was just offering a possible explanation.
Oh. But again, when you think of it, Indochina men are wearing skirts, but are bare chested, Micronesian men don't wear coconut bras, but in the cradle of monotheistic religions, middle east, who's dress code they follow, and if it was up to them, they'd want everyone to dress like that, like God willing believers in the middle east,people wear not skirts, they cover their man boobies just like women would, and they do not wear pants cause it will show their genitals (this was also a law in western world for unisex bikinis), they're quite genderless. They are bare headed only in house.
And though since recent times they force only women to wear headscarf, I don't know how the dress code in your churches and synagogues functions, but there are skirt "info(rcement) desks" which dress inappropriate women in Serbia, and it will pass not much time until it comes to their mind men are also inappropriately showing their "moos knuckle" (that's how Iran started).
I love that red!
The colour of his dress, that red is bomb!
It's one post