Yeah, but it's an expensive car. She was at fault for wearing heels while driving. Really not a good idea. It's good he took it out on the shoes and not her or something.
27,000 pounds is 35,850 US dollars.
How about not destroying her property. He even said she usually doesn't wear them while driving, it was a one off. And how is that even a rational argument? "At least he took it out on her shoes rather than her."
If you gon argue against him destroying her property then what about her destroying his, not to mention she destroyed something worth way more than a pair of shoes
She destroyed something in an accident in and like stated above, she doesn't usually wear them while driving. While he purposefully destroyed her property just because he was mad. Insurance can help pay for the car but not for shoes.
That doesn't give him the right to destroy her property. She didn't crash on purpose, his actions were deliberate. He should seek legal damages instead of ranting about she didn't listen this time and getting revenge. It is creepy and controlling.
He told her not to wear heels, and for a good reason. She didn't listen. While I don't agree with him destroying her heels, it's a much easier bill to front compared to a sports car repair. @that_creepy_guy Taking responsibility by blaming shoes isn't taking responsibility at all, so I don't know where you're going with that. It was her decision to put the heels on and drive against the prohibition of her partner.
by blaming the heels (something he asked her not to wear) he has a valid excuse to destroy the thing that destroyed his car (not saying he'd destroy her)
That's still not a good excuse. He told her to not wear them, and she did. She didn't purposefully wreck the car, it was just negligence.
If a work truck scratches your car that doesn't mean you're entitled to scratch it back. He should have made her pay to replace or repair it, not act like a child and destroy shit that wasn't his.
Negligence, more like arrogance. And I'm guessing that there's damage to the rear bumper, exhaust, and undercarriage, so it's likely that she doesn't have a couple thousand pounds lying around/
Good God.
I tried to fix it, but going by the distribution of thumbs early on, as well as some of your arguments, I truly worry about this generation's ability to form and maintain healthy relationships.
@matthewg You're awfully presumptuous in thinking that this generation would react in the same fashion as this man did. I know for sure that I wouldn't have acted so childish. I maybe would've just had a talk with her and not let her drive it again. @diyrogue I'm just pointing out that heels do not have the same value as a sports car. I'm not saying that's an appropriate response.
Here's some more, fuckstick. You're unequivocally the most gargantuan cuckold I've ever seen. Maybe in the future try looking back at yourself before you start 'worrying about this generation's ability to form and maintain healthy relationships', Mr. Single Dad.
And there's a difference in him making a comment about a generation in passing and you attacking his life and the fact he's a single father when you don't know why he's a single father
He insulted my intelligence for no reason so I insulted him back. He also insinuated that he knew how to have a good relationship when in fact he didn't, which is a little disingenuous. How can he talk shit about the ability to have healthy and stable relationships when he can't do it himself? I pointed out a fact that he gave publicly. If he doesn't bother to ask 'why' when other generation's relationships go south, than why should I ask 'why' about his relationships? Relationships are tricky beasts, no matter what age you are.
Exactly what generation do you think this is related to? The couple in this are obviously in their mid to late 40s, which is exactly why I said the behavior was creepy and highly immature. Also, for those going on about the cost of the car, the damage totalled £70.
You seem mad, dude.
I guess it hasn't occurred to you that it's possible to know how to form and maintain healthy relationships and still have things happen that are out of your control.
But no, go ahead and take your predictable cheap shots, "blaze".
P.S. Your eagerness to misuse the term "cuckold" confirms much of what I suspected about you.
P.P.S. Way to cheerlead, sero. Is your reading comprehension suffering, too?
▼
deleted
· 7 years ago
I was just scrolling by and felt that should be said.
Wasn't going to actually say anything else till you called me out.
Sorry, but this guy just sounds creepy. Like he's talking about his teen daughter and not another adult. Doesn't matter what she SAID happened, you have her pay for the damage and end of story. If I wear heels and have a fender bender, I pay for the damage and I learn my own lesson. Cut up anything I own in retribution and see how fast we're in court because I set all your electronics on fire. I mean, fair is fair.
4
deleted
· 7 years ago
You'd lose.
He'd be wrong, but you fucked up his car and you fucked up his electronics, which unless Gucci begins making high heels, you'd pay for his car and his electronics.
Heels are expensive depending on the ones you get, and believe me, he would be paying for them. If he has insurance and I'm already going to pay for the car--which, depending on the state and insurance laws he might not even be allowed to make me pay for the car if it's no fault--he has no right to destroy anything of mine and I'm going to retaliate. Believe me, the cost of game consoles can easily be matched by my shoe prices, in the case of judgements (and he'd be guilty as hell and have to pay as well) it would be a wash and I'd owe nothing.
Though, I should probably also point put that in a lot of states I could legally walk away from that car and pay nothing. Insurance covers 'permissive use' and if he lets me use it I'm not legally responsible for damage in an accident...his insurance is because he chose to lend the car. Insurance follows the car, he would have to file a claim against his own insurance. So whether I chose to pay because I did damage or not, he was legally in the wrong when he intentionally wrecked my stuff. So yes, he is just as screwed as me if he decides to sue.
deleted
· 7 years ago
You said his electronics. That, at the least is his phone (two hundred to eight hundred), laptop(cheapest are closest to two hundred-fifty, if you want a functioning one), TV(a reach, but you didnt defend yourself nor did you specify so *shrugs*, and some good ones are about one hundred and fifty to seventeen thousand), or a desktop computer ( one hundred to seven hundred). So considering damages, you'd be doing yourself a favor to just seethe and let the guy lose.
▼
deleted
· 7 years ago
Oh and I didn't even get to the payment of the one electronic you actually mentioned, which would cost three hundred to three-fifty
27,000 pounds is 35,850 US dollars.
If a work truck scratches your car that doesn't mean you're entitled to scratch it back. He should have made her pay to replace or repair it, not act like a child and destroy shit that wasn't his.
I tried to fix it, but going by the distribution of thumbs early on, as well as some of your arguments, I truly worry about this generation's ability to form and maintain healthy relationships.
Maybe in the future try reading comments before you start overcompensating for your intellect.
Plain and simple.
I guess it hasn't occurred to you that it's possible to know how to form and maintain healthy relationships and still have things happen that are out of your control.
But no, go ahead and take your predictable cheap shots, "blaze".
P.S. Your eagerness to misuse the term "cuckold" confirms much of what I suspected about you.
P.P.S. Way to cheerlead, sero. Is your reading comprehension suffering, too?
Wasn't going to actually say anything else till you called me out.
He'd be wrong, but you fucked up his car and you fucked up his electronics, which unless Gucci begins making high heels, you'd pay for his car and his electronics.