Why do I even try

I'd argue the opposite is actually "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith

I was thinking "The Art of the Deal" but then I realised that it's basically a direct parallel.

Marx was a leading 19th-century economist in the 'classical' tradition. Indeed, in many ways he is the father of Economic History, having developed explanations for the evolution of the economic structure from feudalism to capitalism. (c)
But what did you achive? You fap on others minds and don't have own opinion...

*majors in economy in a communist country*
*triggered and confused*

Marx's economic policies and theories are more in Capital than the Manifesto. The CM is much more a political phamplet than economic handbook.

...erm...I was gonna say Mein Kampf................I’ll see myself out