The Washington Herald, Washington DC, January 31, 1918
6 years ago by silvermyth · 1384 Likes · 11 comments · Popular
Report
Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest
· 6 years ago
· FIRST
Although I agree with the premise, I honestly think that just a little coal won't do harm. But as I said. I do agree with having her work for it.
1
celticrose
· 6 years ago
That not what this is saying. Its saying that while legally it may be wrong, morally its understandable and the writer would stand with her in stealing the coal for her family.
21
popsy
· 6 years ago
I read a story 20 years or so ago, I think it was New York or Phillidelphia, may be a bit off in the memory. It was about a lady during the great depression that was arrested for stealing a loaf of bread to feed her children. The judge told the other defendants , that were in the court on misdemeanor charges, that their cases would be dropped if they gave the woman a dollar each. The baker that she had taken the bread from had pitch in to. If I remember correctly , she got around 37 bucks. A fairly large sum of money in the 1930s. Wish I remembered the story better, hope it was true. It might have been in Readers Diegst magazine.
13
famousone
· 6 years ago
That's fair. Almost like a kind of community service.
8
garlog
· 6 years ago
Bribing a judge is bad, and accepting bribes as a judge is also bad.
▼
celticrose
· 6 years ago
This is the opposite of bribing. The judge isn't getting the money the defendant is.
7
garlog
· 6 years ago
That's not the opposite of bribing either way, but the point is the judge is compromising the integrity of his judgment.
▼
dash224
· 6 years ago
Since I was called out the other day: this meme isn’t level
silvermyth
· 6 years ago
?
dash224
· 6 years ago
It’s sideways
silvermyth
· 6 years ago
I suppose, but it’s not really a meme, is it?
1