Except in the Universe where you're not
6 years ago by xvarnah · 1252 Likes · 5 comments · Popular
Report
Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
funkmasterrex
· 6 years ago
· FIRST
lmao
6
lucky11
· 6 years ago
That's the thing about the multiverse theory is it can't have any paradoxes or else it doesn't exist. Think of it a bit like the solar system. The Sun being the theory and the planets circling being the various universes. If one them doesn't have a sun they all don't and if one does they all do. That is kind of the point in any unifying theory. It has to work with everything or else it's wrong. And if it's wrong then the idea of a multiverse existing is wrong.
funkmasterrex
· 6 years ago
It's easier to understand if you just take away the Sun imo. Either way the paradox exists.... and it's not even close to the best explanation. A large range, but still a finite one makes more sense. You can have infinites even within a finite spacetime.
lucky11
· 6 years ago
I would have to disagree. If you use the basic idea that every outcome must exist in the multiverse, it would negate itself. Sort of like a self correcting system. Any outcome that would have a negating effect on the whole would instead be removed. In this way instead of every outcome existing only the possible ones would. Of course there are several multiverse theories but there would be no way to prove or disprove any universe whose rules ruled out a multiverse because they couldn't ever exist beside one which does. So a paradox couldn't exist because it would resolve itself before becoming a paradox. Granted all this is a moot point because right now the multiverse isn't even a real theory merely a hypothesis with the possibility of no way to gather evidence for or against.
third
· 6 years ago
That ain't how it works people.
▼