Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
felixo77
· 6 years ago
· FIRST
The distinction is quite simple. Do you own the canvas or have permission to use it? No? Then it is vandalism, regardless of how pretty it looks.
31
regretfulforeigner
· 6 years ago
The photo shown is of a commissioned mural, so yes, it is art
37
pitty
· 6 years ago
that belongs in a museum
13
refmococ0
· 6 years ago
*indiana Jones intensifies*
2
xvarnah
· 6 years ago
In this case, it's both, unless the owner of the property says otherwise
17
xxjulieisawesomexx
· 6 years ago
Something that takes this much time and equipment is 100% paid for by the owners of the building. So yup. Art. (But imo it would be either way. Art is art whether you want it there or not.)
6
guest_
· 6 years ago
A thing can be both.
9
chilledtothebone
· 6 years ago
This in particular is a paid commission. It is not vandalism. Vandalism can be art, but not all art is vandalism. You can normally tell if it was paid for by the quality and structure of the work.
6
guest
· 6 years ago
Vart.
1
guest
· 6 years ago
this is in montreal, right?
guest
· 6 years ago
Aww it looks like a Mucha piece!
3