Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
xvarnah
· 6 years ago
· FIRST
A couple of these dudes look like they have no fucking clue what they're doing here
18
xvarnah
· 6 years ago
Which is impressive because I'm pretty sure that's how *all* of them should look
11
spiderwoman
· 6 years ago
JEFFERY YOU GET YO ASS BACK ONTO THIS BRANCH WE GONNA GO DOWN THIS SHITHOLE TOGETHER
1
dr_richard_ew
· 6 years ago
That straight line is how it looks when you only choose to see the evolution of a single species
10
guest_
· 6 years ago
The “straight line” is not an accurate picture- but neither is the other example. Both are intended to simplify a concept to a point most people can understand it, based on the most relevant and concrete ancestors of a species. In truth, genetic mutations and adaptations abound within a species. The study of evolotuion is a non exact science as there is debate on when we even consider something as a separate species or just a mutation within a species, where the lines blur between extinction and absorption into another species- and so on. The classification of certain extreme examples of a species, phylum, etc shows most clearly where the ambiguities in the system exist. The “line” just shows a concept- that selective gene pairs through repeated breeding create new and novel organisms over time.
5