Iirc, Trump lost the popular vote but won the electoral.
deleted
· 5 years ago
he was still voted in regardless of how it happened it boils down to the same thing enough people voted for him/his party for him to end up in control of the country
Especially with our current CIC we could. Past administrations were either too spineless to finish the mission, or overextended our forces for missions they weren't trained for.
President Trump at least knows to let soldiers do what we're trained to do.
Ain't got nothing on us.
Our culture, military, and economy spread further and deeper than they could've ever dreamed.
▼
deleted
· 5 years ago
when it comes to numbers both China and India have more military personnel than the USA when it comes to culture that is subjective economy the USA is indeed currently the largest
There's a huge issue with measuring military size. A large military does not constitute an ability to project that power. Both china and india have large numbers of soldiers only because they have large populations. Current estimates put the Chinese military at roughly 2.1 million whereas the us itself has 1.3 million. That being said unlike China the us isnt alone, the us has NATO. Curently the top 10 nato militaries combined have roughly 2.8 million personnel. So in the end the us military won't be the only military in a fight. Another point to make is power projection, the us is currently the only nation to be able to strike anywhere in the world. The us military base network is worldwide and ready at a moments notice. India and china are mostly relegated to asia.
Pffft, silly whatever you are. The us invaded canada twice in its history and has an open invitation to join the union at any given time
3
·
Edited 5 years ago
deleted
· 5 years ago
i was only going by pure numbers due to laziness on my part it gets slowly more and more complex when you start looking at worldwide spread technology allies and all that stuff
Yeah it's all very complex, i do want to say one more thing though. The us as the #1 world power took out the #5 military power in the 90s in 35 days of active combat. It was a coalition effort but the us had 700,000 of the 950,000 soldiers in the coalition
Invasion:
an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.
Doesn't distinguish between whether the invasion held territory/was successful or not.
Examples:
Iraqs invasion of Kuwait
Nazi germanys invasion of the soviet union
Still an invasion nonetheless
I never claimed for it to have been successful. Simply that an invasion occurred, your comment above claimed the us never invaded canada and yet it had. Back to the corner with you demon!
They lost India not just due to Gandhi but also other thousands who refused to pay taxes and bear the brunt. It was a loss to the british government and East India company and their survival was in danger. This is the reason why the British left.
President Trump at least knows to let soldiers do what we're trained to do.
Our culture, military, and economy spread further and deeper than they could've ever dreamed.
an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.
Doesn't distinguish between whether the invasion held territory/was successful or not.
Examples:
Iraqs invasion of Kuwait
Nazi germanys invasion of the soviet union
Still an invasion nonetheless