Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest
· 5 years ago
· FIRST
And even thou he was and is a very nice guy, he was one of the worst presidents ever.
3
guest_
· 5 years ago
There is and has been great debate over wether Carter was or wasn’t a good president. Many say he was unfairly judged- a man facing world problems that would have made any human seem ill equipped to handle. We can go back and forth- wether one believes Carter was or wasn’t a bad president- he was voted out after one term and never re-elected, and it’s almost unarguable he’s done more good out of office than in office- although comparing 4 years to the rest of his life seems unfair. That said- it’s largely irrelevant to the point- that as a politician he sacrificed his personal assets to better and more transparently serve the nation. I wonder if Carter would have shown his taxes publicly? He certainly never tried to charge the state an exorbitant bill to let dignitaries your his peanut farm. But then again- the Bushes and Cheney’s and others didn’t severe their ties to their business interests in office and it’s not like we waged a war using PMC’s they owned or anything like that....
5
matthewg
· 5 years ago
I'm consistently amazed at your unwavering ability to speak truth to the willfully ignorant. I honestly don't know how you keep at it.
3
jmvail
· 5 years ago
Not that I'm discrediting these actions but he also had that crazy plan that depending on the type of car you drove you could only go to the gas station on certain days and there were insane lines for gas does no one remember that?
pripyatplatypus
· 5 years ago
He was president during an oil crisis at a time when fuel efficiency was a cruel joke. Gas stations were literally running out of gas and they had to try something. Let's also not forget that he put solar panels on the roof of the White House and Reagan tore them down.
3
jmvail
· 5 years ago
True on the oil crisis. Any sources on the Reagan thing?
▼
guest_
· 5 years ago
It could be argued that the Carter administration could have better handled the second oil crisis. Food for thought though- the first crisis occurred under Nixon and was a result of his and previous administrations foreign policies. The second crisis occurred in an economy which was still trying to adapt to a floating dollar and where previous administrations had cut down domestic oil production and reserves. Carter wasn’t responsible for the secondary factors which contributed to the second crash, and if one remembers- he also had nothing to do with and could t likely have prevented the Iraq Iran war which primarily caused the second crisis. The “odd even” systems and other methods of rationing predated Carter to the Nixon administration.
pripyatplatypus
· 5 years ago
https://forgottenhistoryblog.com/the-white-house-sported-solar-panels-until-reagan-removed-them-in-1986/
1
ardinola
· 5 years ago
In any case of the stuff above or Carter’s tenure as president, his actions leading up to his presidency and those after speak to his morals and character. Even if the move to the trust was provoked politically or wholly a personal choice, he obliged. Those in office now hold onto property even when conflicting with their role and often abuse their power.
6