loophole

Shut up, they fit the definition to a tee. You don't have to have powers to be a superhero.

Plus in the comics Iron Man is the holder of the space stone..so..basically infinite power

W-elll.... According to merriam-webster:
"Definition of superhero
: a fictional hero having extraordinary or superhuman powers
'
also : an exceptionally skillful or successful person"
'
I'm not sure what to make of this definition since by that standard Bill Gates is a superhero

Also, I didn't think "Logan" was bad. And I still like the Incredibles

They aren't superhero since they don't have any powers

Fucktons of money is definitely a super power. And how is Deadpool not a superhero? He fits your definition to a tee.

Deadpool isnt really a hero until it suits him..money is usually his driving cause

Having money doesn't give you super power

Having that much money is. And prep time is a superpower.

No it doesn't

Yes

So does that mean Lex Luthor is a superhero with super powers becasue he has money

Yes. He's a supervillain. Money is how he can contend with Superman. He's as big a threat to Supes as Darkseid or Doomsday.

He is not a super villain as he doesn't have super powers

Than just what the fuck is he then?

He's just a villain

Random robbers and murderers are villains. Supervillains are villains who can contend with superheroes.

People who have powers are superheroes/villains

An alternate definition of superhero is "an extremely skilled or successful person". So, by definition, superheros like Batman, Ironman, and Blue Beetle are superheroes.

Batman isn't a superhero though he's a vigilante

Those things aren't mutually exclusive

Are you really downvoting all of my comments

I'm surprised you aren't doing the same to mine.

Maybe becasue I'm not immature and only see this as a bit of fun

I downvoted the first few but then I stopped.