Maybe someone else who's using that font made a screenshot of her tweet. Maybe it wasn't her.
It is very much an atrocious font though.
Edit: I used Twitter like twice in my life though so if I'm wrong about how this font thing works, my apologies
1
·
Edited 5 years ago
deleted
· 5 years ago
I haven't got a clue how any of this works, and your first assumption makes a lot of sense I guess. There's probably a way for people to set this insult to reason and sanity as default font on their device. So mea culpa.
That's true, you can't use the same work twice. But if the person in the tweet just put it on their site, does it count as plagiarism? What if they made it specifically for the assignment and liked it so much they also published it online?
so i'm going by what turnitin says. they are pretty thorough, it seems its more of an issue in academia. I'm just agreeing with masterweird's point that it is possible to plagiarize yourself. please read turnitin's piece on it
link; https://www.turnitin.com/blog/is-recycling-your-own-work-plagiarism
EDIT: it really shouldn't be an issue in art but i'm not a visual arts student so i'm not familiar with how they define plagiarism, and one does have to account for that turnitin is a journal/essay submission program and not so much a visual submission program so they focus on written media
It is very much an atrocious font though.
Edit: I used Twitter like twice in my life though so if I'm wrong about how this font thing works, my apologies
link; https://www.turnitin.com/blog/is-recycling-your-own-work-plagiarism
EDIT: it really shouldn't be an issue in art but i'm not a visual arts student so i'm not familiar with how they define plagiarism, and one does have to account for that turnitin is a journal/essay submission program and not so much a visual submission program so they focus on written media