Leaking and telling lies about the case, nevermind compromising the case's integrity by coaching the complainant, and enabling the moving of goalposts whenever the investigation can't find the alleged wrongdoing, really aren't a prosecutor's job.
And you can shit on the left for doing away with presumption of innocence, because they've been screaming about impeaching him before he could even swear in.
The lack of self awareness is nice.
Republicans were talking about impeaching Clinton if she was elected as well. So it's a bit rich to criticize democrats for being consistent in their belief that Trump was corrupt since day 1. It's not like Trump has been wiping his ass with the emoluments clause since the day he took office. Just because the democrats have had to wait until Trump did something really obviously bad doesn't mean he hasn't been doing shaddy shit since he took office.
Making up lies about the case can be argued against republicans just as much, you know they whole "no obstruction no collusion" when anyone who actually read the Mueller report could see multiple counts of obstruction. And thats despite the best effort of the WH to... you know... obstruct the investigation.
[...]
[...]
To that you could add the various attempts by republicans to spread the conspiracy that Ukraine might be the source of the 2016 interference, which is a theory that has been debunked by American intelligence agencies, and proven as Russian propaganda. But you know.... it makes for good soundbytes so who cares about facts ? No-one is gonna fact check Fox News anyways.
Finally, you say the left coached the complainant, and I'd love some quotes on that, but even so, that's a nice case of hypocrisy when you consider McConell was OPENLY cooperating and taking instructions from the defendant (aka Trump) to ensure they could lead the trial in a way that would lead to a quick exoneration. Because who cares about checks and balance anyways ?
Just because one party refuses to hold their own accountable, doesn't make one any less guilty.
Emoluments? Nonissue. Trump has accepted no foreign titles or unprecedented gifts.
If there was obstruction or collusion Mueller would've pinned him, but there was nothing substantial enough to make a case. Ergo, innocent.
Ukraine did interfere with the election. As did China, Russia, France, Britain, Taiwan, the Koreas, and literally every country somehow impacted by the US. Shit, a falsified British report was used to kick the first investigation off.
Fox News is constantly shit on, nevermind that even their coverage of POTUS is 52% negative.
McConnell is Senate leader, the house never had a case, ain't the Senate's job to back or cover for the House.
Checks and balances? The House tried to charge Trump with obstruction for THEIR refusal get SCOTUS to rule on the subpoenas. You know, the actual fucking check that's been in place for most of America's history.
Meanwhile Trump has been doing work while the Dems have done... what exactly?
I mean he's not receiving gifts, just they are somehow staying at Trump's hotel. Probably for the view I guess. As I said, the house waited for something more 'serious'.
That's a nice way of ignoring the fact that it was proven, by American intelligence agencies, that Russia had directly interfered in the 2016 election. But yeah, I guess other countries had opinions and Trump doesn't like french wine, so obviously all wine lovers were outraged and france intefered.
Regarding Mueller, you misrepresent Mueller following the DOJ policy not to indict a sitting president, and instead simply laying out the findings, and the multiple counts of alleged obstruction of justice. All while signaling that throughout the whole investigation the WH did all it could to block / limit it, so you know... he obstructed the investigation into obstruction.
In the meantime the democrats are waiting for McConnell to vote on 400bills, hundreds of them with bipartisan support, but hey, who cares about facts?
They're staying at his hotels. So what?
Other countries did directly interfere, it' be plain stupid not to. Particularly when Trump was campaigning to kill the deals Obama illegally signed on to sans congress.
No charges means no substantial crime in a nation that presumes innocence. Nevermind that Trump actually played ball then, before he learned better.
And naming a bill "bipartisan" doesn't make it bipartisan.
Far as I'm concerned, the fewer laws passed is a sign of a good Congress.
So let me get this straight. The lazy democrats are doing nothing, damn them. But congress blocking the laws (that those lazy democrats are doing while doing nothing) is good. Got it. Im gonna stay in my world where facts and logic matter. Have a good one.
And btw, congress blocking laws isn't the same as McConnell not putting laws to a vote.
@famousone He purposefully started charging more and directed them to his hotels. So what? It's a big "what?" because regardless of how you feel about it, it's a fucking crime. And honestly, that's just the tip of the iceberg with is emoluments violations.
Citation needed. Not really though, that wouldn't be emoluments anyways, especially not in any constitutional context. Is it a title or grant of nobility? Is it indebtedness to foreign actors? Or maybe they're just trying to butter him up? Too bad, that's politics, and it clearly ain't working.
so Trumps mentor, friend and associate was found guilty of witness tampering and other crimes to coverup what's been happening, but of course, just another close friend of Trump is found guilty, but he's innocent, just surrounds himself with criminals.
Republicans were talking about impeaching Clinton if she was elected as well. So it's a bit rich to criticize democrats for being consistent in their belief that Trump was corrupt since day 1. It's not like Trump has been wiping his ass with the emoluments clause since the day he took office. Just because the democrats have had to wait until Trump did something really obviously bad doesn't mean he hasn't been doing shaddy shit since he took office.
Making up lies about the case can be argued against republicans just as much, you know they whole "no obstruction no collusion" when anyone who actually read the Mueller report could see multiple counts of obstruction. And thats despite the best effort of the WH to... you know... obstruct the investigation.
[...]
To that you could add the various attempts by republicans to spread the conspiracy that Ukraine might be the source of the 2016 interference, which is a theory that has been debunked by American intelligence agencies, and proven as Russian propaganda. But you know.... it makes for good soundbytes so who cares about facts ? No-one is gonna fact check Fox News anyways.
Finally, you say the left coached the complainant, and I'd love some quotes on that, but even so, that's a nice case of hypocrisy when you consider McConell was OPENLY cooperating and taking instructions from the defendant (aka Trump) to ensure they could lead the trial in a way that would lead to a quick exoneration. Because who cares about checks and balance anyways ?
Just because one party refuses to hold their own accountable, doesn't make one any less guilty.
If there was obstruction or collusion Mueller would've pinned him, but there was nothing substantial enough to make a case. Ergo, innocent.
Ukraine did interfere with the election. As did China, Russia, France, Britain, Taiwan, the Koreas, and literally every country somehow impacted by the US. Shit, a falsified British report was used to kick the first investigation off.
Fox News is constantly shit on, nevermind that even their coverage of POTUS is 52% negative.
McConnell is Senate leader, the house never had a case, ain't the Senate's job to back or cover for the House.
Checks and balances? The House tried to charge Trump with obstruction for THEIR refusal get SCOTUS to rule on the subpoenas. You know, the actual fucking check that's been in place for most of America's history.
Meanwhile Trump has been doing work while the Dems have done... what exactly?
That's a nice way of ignoring the fact that it was proven, by American intelligence agencies, that Russia had directly interfered in the 2016 election. But yeah, I guess other countries had opinions and Trump doesn't like french wine, so obviously all wine lovers were outraged and france intefered.
Regarding Mueller, you misrepresent Mueller following the DOJ policy not to indict a sitting president, and instead simply laying out the findings, and the multiple counts of alleged obstruction of justice. All while signaling that throughout the whole investigation the WH did all it could to block / limit it, so you know... he obstructed the investigation into obstruction.
In the meantime the democrats are waiting for McConnell to vote on 400bills, hundreds of them with bipartisan support, but hey, who cares about facts?
Other countries did directly interfere, it' be plain stupid not to. Particularly when Trump was campaigning to kill the deals Obama illegally signed on to sans congress.
No charges means no substantial crime in a nation that presumes innocence. Nevermind that Trump actually played ball then, before he learned better.
And naming a bill "bipartisan" doesn't make it bipartisan.
Far as I'm concerned, the fewer laws passed is a sign of a good Congress.
And btw, congress blocking laws isn't the same as McConnell not putting laws to a vote.