Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
xvarnah
· 4 years ago
· FIRST
I don't want nothing to do with either
3
cryoenthusiast
· 4 years ago
Xvarnah infested funsubstances?
4
xvarnah
· 4 years ago
Oh, the infestation runs much deeper than that, my friend
4
dr_richard_ew
· 4 years ago
Dear God shes taken the entire internet
1
guest_
· 4 years ago
Not really? We would use similar language if a million people all went to some event in a small and scenic natural park- because while humans live on land- we do not typically occupy such areas in large numbers. Sharks may live in water- but you’d likely be quite surprised to discover one in your bath.
▼
guest_
· 4 years ago
Likewise- an infestation specifically implies large numbers. So if we say “yeah, there are Coyotes that live right outside town...” that’s nature. They live there. Good to know. You MIGHT rarely see a coyote or run in to one. But if we say “yeah. That town is coyote infested...” that says there are ALOT. Not you could or might see one but more like- if you go here, you WILL run across a coyote.
▼
guest_
· 4 years ago
And lastly- infested implies damage or harm. A rabbit is no big deal. Pretty harmless by and large. Ask Australia what an infestation of rabbits looks like- when they are destroying the local plant life and by extension killing off native species. So a few sharks being around an area of ocean isn’t really a big deal- waters that are shark infested- there is a serious danger there. It’s a good distinction to know.