It's not bigotry when the subhumans have it coming.
deleted
· 3 years ago
Even women did not watch this movie. Thats how good the movie was. I think people like Elizabeth Banks, Tessa Thompson, Brie Larson, Amber Turd etc... should not be given platforms to express their bigotry. I don't remember Jodie Foster, Pam Grier, Sigourney Weaver denigrating men to promote their movies/ celebrity status.
Most sane women don't want this bullshit either.
`
I genuinely can't comprehend how so many people have become content to watch others look at someone and go "you are evil. You are worth less. You are the cause of all my problems. I *will* destroy you. You deserve nothing you've earned." All based on their race and sex.
`
Those women are more toxic than any man I've ever met. And at this point i'm about ready to throw Megan Markle in with them.
`
Not to mention they denigrate and infantilize women as much as they do men. Amber heard in particular is one of the worst
3
deleted
· 3 years ago
Most women that I met also had this maturity and decency. Unfortunately, to look for decent females/ males among celebrities that's tough. I would also add Jennifer Lawrence to the mix.
There aren't many decent celebrities. And yeah it seems like more and more women are becoming entitled, whiny, abusive, POS.
`
Idk anything about Jennifer Lawrence other than she seems a decent actress
3
deleted
· 3 years ago
Have a look at her comments on Harvey Weinstein. Those did not age well. I think that hers, Streep and Paltrow's comments normalise what Harvey did. Its only afterwards that they will tell you that they were victims. Jennifer Lawrence was the one who shown the most love to this creep.
1
deleted
· 3 years ago
Imagine a young actress who interacted with Weinstein and was scarred for life. Then at the Globes and stupid oscars, she sees J.Law, Meryl Streep and Gwymeth Goop show their admiration and love for that rapeface. She would think "Oh, what he did to me was normal". Imagine if those bitches instead when they got their fame went public and were the ones that first denounced those reprehensible behaviours. People like Courtney Love and Rose Mc Gowan would have felt supported.
Jesus, you really don't get it? He made them. They knew the rules of the game and went along with it. Now, that does speak to their character, but at least they know who they are and what the fuck they've signed on for.
What were they supposed to do? Shit on the guy who had gotten away with it for decades in an industry built over a century on quid pro quo and "favors", right after he made them so many millions of dollars?
This is the real world, and in the real world we know that nothing changed. That nothing will change, for them.
This is much like historical discussion, judge people by the standards of their environment, not a mythical ideal one where good things happen to good people and justice is infallible and objective.
No offense, but it looks like a circular argument, saying that "we know nothing will change so we shouldn't try to change it", and brings the question of the balance between money and the respect of human beings.
1
deleted
· 3 years ago
Its basically the Ostrich approach. How can we expect the world to change if we have to wait on others?
That's not my job. I'm not a scientist. I'm someone who says that conceptually, this cancer should not be left untreated just because "it's what it is".
I guess, with sufficient time, training, investment, I could, but that's not really the point.
There are very few male and females but if you think there is none, that's a grim picture of reality you're painting. The overall point is summed up well by Dave Chappelle: forgive the weak and support the strongest. Thats why I'm saying actors/ actresses should not have glorified him in public. The strong victims who testified only needed support from their colleagues.
I think that the people who do know should tell now that they're in a position to do so, the only thing I can do is not support inertia and accept a situation where someone is in a position to commit crimes unpunished, which is maybe useless but better than the alternative.
I agree about the Dave Chappelle point, given the possible backlash it takes guts to stand against the circumstances and a powerful cancerous institution.
1
deleted
· 3 years ago
The good news is that while social media is poisonous, it allows a platform for victims.
It was a lot more subtle/slow though
`
I genuinely can't comprehend how so many people have become content to watch others look at someone and go "you are evil. You are worth less. You are the cause of all my problems. I *will* destroy you. You deserve nothing you've earned." All based on their race and sex.
`
Those women are more toxic than any man I've ever met. And at this point i'm about ready to throw Megan Markle in with them.
`
Not to mention they denigrate and infantilize women as much as they do men. Amber heard in particular is one of the worst
`
Idk anything about Jennifer Lawrence other than she seems a decent actress
What were they supposed to do? Shit on the guy who had gotten away with it for decades in an industry built over a century on quid pro quo and "favors", right after he made them so many millions of dollars?
This is the real world, and in the real world we know that nothing changed. That nothing will change, for them.
This is much like historical discussion, judge people by the standards of their environment, not a mythical ideal one where good things happen to good people and justice is infallible and objective.
I guess, with sufficient time, training, investment, I could, but that's not really the point.
I agree about the Dave Chappelle point, given the possible backlash it takes guts to stand against the circumstances and a powerful cancerous institution.