They are! And the reason they can draw these maps is that they find the most efficient way to food and leave some chemicals to make sure they won’t use the same path twice. When they’re cut in halves both parts can “remember” the paths.
Even without that, where the cities are anyway does a decent job. There are a few lines I'd add, like SF to Portland, but you can see it's pretty close to the passes in the rockies, the Ohio River Valley is basically a circle, and the bridges across the Mississippi are pretty accurate; although the Mississippi needs more bridges, because when one gets put on hiatus for repairs it causes a massive flustercluck. I'd also add a lot more highways on the eastern corridor, just because the traffic jam one path would cause would be a nightmare.
Yeah, it’s certainly missing some lines that humans would need.
I mention terrain because I live in the Appalachian mountains and recognize how convoluted my drive can be because there’s a mountain in the way.
I mention terrain because I live in the Appalachian mountains and recognize how convoluted my drive can be because there’s a mountain in the way.