Divide and conquer
if I was a highly cynical man I'd say that the "ruling class" tried to divide us on class lines in classical Marxism, then when that broadly failed they tried the "systemic racism" and "white guilt" tropes to distract from their own issues
United we stand, divided we fall
Hey, that sounds a lot like what literally happened, which is as clear as mountain air to anyone who looks into critical theory and it's racist derivative Critical Race Theory.
I wonder if these kinda folk would count me as a “white” that lied about being native since I’m a mix blood and out of all of the things the Irish part of my genetics could dominate the native part for is making my skin color make me pass for purely Caucasian if you can’t see my facial bone structure or eye shape.
Doesn't really matter if the folks that lied about it count you as white. Only if the college admissions do, in which case it seems you'd be at a disadvantage
not saying that the colleges are right, hell they did a fucky-wucky but-
.
if they dont do this then they get hailed as racist and they end up losing credibility for no reason...
which is complete and utter bullshit
It's almost like the system is bias but not in the way they say it is. Now if only we'd shut up and let them indoctrinate children about how evil white people is and how weak and incapable other skin colors are
I do consider myself well-informed, but I'm not considering myself a pundit until more people seek out and ask for my perspective. That is to say: Because I like you so much, this one's free.
3
deleted
· 2 years ago
I do consider you a liar and agitator without any integrity whatsoever. This is to say: please go away.
.
edit: sorry for the inappropriate wording of my post.
I don't care that you use profanity. But if you could go ahead and not attack my integrity, like you've attacked my identity on numerous occasions, you may find our interactions much more pleasant.
Regardless of the conversation this comment chain turned into I will say, after clicking the link general failure posted, it’s really damn annoying the platform people post massive argumentation and debates on has a character limit so small what would fit in 2 messages max here takes that dude 14 tweets to fit
6
·
Edited 2 years ago
deleted
· 2 years ago
Which is why right wing liars and agitators who make it a habit to oversimplify and misrepresent complex matters just LOVE Twatter like it's the love child of Jesus and Ronald Reagan.
. A guy who is constantly fantasizing about killing folks and whose rhetorics mainly consist of straw man arguments has no integrity in a civilized society. In my book.
You'll also find that many people don't use Twitter. But when someone puts something out there with their name on it, it is of course the fault of anyone who tries to share or comment on it. Right?
"Let's talk about the deleted tweet."
.
Meaning "right wing pundits" responded to exactly what he said, in full context. He then realized the conversation wasn't going the way he wanted it to, deleted the tweet, and then tried to provide the context he felt would be most favourable to him.
.
The article he posted originally in no way supports his claim that white people are more privileged. Posting 500 follow-up articles doesn't actually negate the idiocy of the original post. And people will mock him for it, and rightly so.
For someone with so little ground worth defending, it's no wonder you're always clinging so tightly to that high horse of yours. Would also explain why you're such a damn sore ass all the time lol
.
Reminds me of that darkness_within shmuck. You spew the same kind of redundant garbage he did almost verbatim
*insert 5 people incessantly whining about the existence of Andy Ngo rather than the points actually made in the meme*
if I was a highly cynical man I'd say that the "ruling class" tried to divide us on class lines in classical Marxism, then when that broadly failed they tried the "systemic racism" and "white guilt" tropes to distract from their own issues
United we stand, divided we fall
If they designed it to sell
We'd buy up every single box
And divide us ourselves"
.
if they dont do this then they get hailed as racist and they end up losing credibility for no reason...
which is complete and utter bullshit
it's not meant to change the minds of said pundits, as that would probably take a lobotomy. It's meant for those who'ld like the full story, from both sides.
.
edit: sorry for the inappropriate wording of my post.
. A guy who is constantly fantasizing about killing folks and whose rhetorics mainly consist of straw man arguments has no integrity in a civilized society. In my book.
.
Meaning "right wing pundits" responded to exactly what he said, in full context. He then realized the conversation wasn't going the way he wanted it to, deleted the tweet, and then tried to provide the context he felt would be most favourable to him.
.
The article he posted originally in no way supports his claim that white people are more privileged. Posting 500 follow-up articles doesn't actually negate the idiocy of the original post. And people will mock him for it, and rightly so.
.
Reminds me of that darkness_within shmuck. You spew the same kind of redundant garbage he did almost verbatim