The original proposition is about the distinction between men, women and bears. The added context fails to make this distinction. Let me know if there's some deep mystery to you there.
14% of bear attacks are fatal, but still less traumatising than being sexually assaulted
Additionally, these statistics are irrelevant.
The question is: would you rather run into a bear or a man?
The likelihood of encountering a bear day to day is a nonfactor
Additionally, these statistics are irrelevant.
The question is: would you rather run into a bear or a man?
The likelihood of encountering a bear day to day is a nonfactor