The damn confidence!! 5 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Not if the quiz is literally:
Write your answer
1.
2.
3.
etc...
I've had a few of those. You were allowed your homework but not the textbook. So if you didn't do it you wouldn't even know what the question was, let alone answer it.
Write your answer
1.
2.
3.
etc...
I've had a few of those. You were allowed your homework but not the textbook. So if you didn't do it you wouldn't even know what the question was, let alone answer it.
The damn confidence!! 5 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Teacher: All right pop quiz time. This is worth %30 of your grade. Don't worry this is completely based off the homework so if you did it you'll have the answers. You have 5 minutes.
6
Probably should stop dating the girlfriend and start dating the brother now 15 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
That's generally the most common theory of why the most abundant metal on the surface was not used whereas "shiny" metals like copper or tin were used first. Aluminum is actual one of the most common metals but since it takes so much processing to use it didn't really show up until the industrial revolution and even then was akin to gold in price. Copper however, can be easy to spot and can become malleable with just a camp fire making it a metal that was used. Combine it with tin and you get bronze. Iron takes a bit more effort and unlike gold you generally don't find it just lying around on the surface since it tends to turn into iron oxide (rust). Interestingly iron oxide was used as a coloring agent long before iron tools came to be. After all who would look at this red dust stuff and think it was a metal.
1
Bye bye man bun 1 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Umm, no. Instead I think we should treat it like you do any dangerous hornet hive and light it on fire.
If you can answer this you're a robot 2 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Well that's easy. All you have to do is just look at it for a few moments and you'd see it too. Obviously there are only two that could really use the decrescendo but only the one without moving into the overly dramatic. It's not hard. Just look at the argument, counter argument of them while not ignoring the supporting elements of the other parts. Is it building tension or resolving? Of course you don't decrescendo the resolving that's just silly. Unless, of course it's needed for effect. At least half of these are in the building phase and you certainly aren't going to be putting a decrescendo there, well unless the counter part is needed to build the tension to offset the main line, but that not pointedly not the case in these selections.
1
·
Edited 1 year ago
That's so gemini 5 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Person 1: You're gender fluid?
Person 2: Yes, sometimes I'm a man and sometimes I'm woman.
Person 1: Okay, and it says here you think all men are pigs?
Person 2: Lol, yes men are just pigs, they never treat you with the respect you deserve.
Person 1: But sometimes you're a man. Does that make you a pig?
Person 2: Well no because I'm a woman.
Person 1: ?? But you said sometimes you're a woman and sometimes you're a man.
Person 2: Yes, I'm genderfluid.
Person 1: So when you're a man you're a pig.
Person 2: Well men are pigs but I'm not a pig when I'm a man.
Person 1: But all men are pigs?
Person 2: Yes, just not with me. I'm not a pig.
Person 1: Then not all men are pigs.
Person 2 : No, all men are pigs.
Person 1: Then you're not a man.
Person 2: How dare you!! Who are you to .....
1
·
Edited 1 year ago
Person 2: Yes, sometimes I'm a man and sometimes I'm woman.
Person 1: Okay, and it says here you think all men are pigs?
Person 2: Lol, yes men are just pigs, they never treat you with the respect you deserve.
Person 1: But sometimes you're a man. Does that make you a pig?
Person 2: Well no because I'm a woman.
Person 1: ?? But you said sometimes you're a woman and sometimes you're a man.
Person 2: Yes, I'm genderfluid.
Person 1: So when you're a man you're a pig.
Person 2: Well men are pigs but I'm not a pig when I'm a man.
Person 1: But all men are pigs?
Person 2: Yes, just not with me. I'm not a pig.
Person 1: Then not all men are pigs.
Person 2 : No, all men are pigs.
Person 1: Then you're not a man.
Person 2: How dare you!! Who are you to .....
"Scheiße" 2 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Yeah no, there have been several that have written more than nine and likely the most prodigious with 342 is still alive. But it is interesting how many only got to 8-10 before they died.
https://www.cmuse.org/who-wrote-the-most-symphonies/
·
Edited 1 year ago
https://www.cmuse.org/who-wrote-the-most-symphonies/
Expensive plants 10 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Here's one currently in development and limited production:
https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2019/08/15/mexican-start-up-fights-air-pollution-with-artificial-trees.html
3
·
Edited 1 year ago
https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2019/08/15/mexican-start-up-fights-air-pollution-with-artificial-trees.html
Tsutomu Yamaguchi is a legend 2 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Tsutomu Yamaguchi
https://www.history.com/news/the-man-who-survived-two-atomic-bombs
One of maybe 175 that survived both bombings.
1
·
Edited 1 year ago
https://www.history.com/news/the-man-who-survived-two-atomic-bombs
One of maybe 175 that survived both bombings.
POV you give too many ***s at an exam 1 comments
This is why you organise 2 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Unless your in a state that doesn't require a reason to terminate. In those states as long as the "reported" reason is not one of the very few illegal ones they can certainly get rid of you. It then puts the entire onus on you to prove they fired you illegally. And just so you know the reason can be as simple as "failure to conform to company environment". That's a great generic reason and there's almost nothing you can say or do to prove that that's not the reason.
5
Best news this year so far 3 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
That's a thing? I mean news with the Kardashians in it. I went years where I had no clue who they were and this was when they were in their rising fame state. Even today, unless it's lambasted everywhere, I doubt I'd see something about them.
Be kind! Destroy the system! 13 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
This is why there's a law on the books in Canada that says the other party is not admitting fault just because they say "sorry".
2
Tfw no cashier hand touching 1 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
As someone who regularly gave change back that literally means nothing. Sometimes you slide the change in, sometimes you place it in. Sometimes you drop. It's much much more dependent on what and how much change you're giving to a customer. Tons of coins you're probably placing or dropping. Bills and change? Handing it or sliding it gently if the change is on top of the bills. Sometimes you just put the change next to them on the counter, though that's usually if they're doing something or their hands are busy.
3
Has a sling and doesn't use it 2 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
The only issue I have with this is how the dude is resting his weapon. A wrong bump or a funny shift and he could have a serious problem.
1
SW Day 96 1 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
It's sad, maybe, but I can almost hear them just by looking at this picture.
http://soundfxcenter.com/movies/star-wars/8d82b5_Star_Wars_Tusken_Raider_Warcry_Sound_Effect.mp3
·
Edited 1 year ago
http://soundfxcenter.com/movies/star-wars/8d82b5_Star_Wars_Tusken_Raider_Warcry_Sound_Effect.mp3
Fillosuffee 6 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
This also leads to some rather uncomfortable and sometimes problematic issues. A liar thinks everyone lies. A thief thinks everyone steals. A cheater that everyone cheats etc.... They "think" that way because that's the way they would act or interact with the world. This does not mean that a liar can more easily spot a lie or a thief a thief. Just that that's the way they view the world. Observations should not be limited to just what you think about and is not always easier to spot something just because you're "thinking" about it. Observation is a skill you need to work at and what you observe is entirely dependent on what "you" can actually observe.
1
·
Edited 1 year ago
Reasonable 2 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
When you reach the point in learning where you think you know what you're doing but haven't reached the point where realize you really don't know and need to learn more.
1
Shirley you can't be serious 3 comments
lucky11
· 1 year ago
Not a new thing. Grocery stores would occasionally mark up cans that were a quarter that weren't selling and sell them 3 for a $1.
1: Do you math?
2: Sure, occasionally. Stay away from the hard stuff. Never do coke.
1: I said math. You know 1+1=2.
2: Oh, Oh, "Math." No, I try not too.
1: You don't say.
3
1: Do you math?
2: Sure, occasionally. Stay away from the hard stuff. Never do coke.
1: I said math. You know 1+1=2.
2: Oh, Oh, "Math." No, I try not too.
1: You don't say.
Smh. Kids these days 5 comments
Had to save it to my computer then rotate it since some of us don't use this site on our phones.