true but that's the wrong kind of attempted equality. the right way would be to stop fucking judging people and making fun out of them because of their sex life. it's none of our fucking business after all, is it? they want to fuck anything that moves? as long as they responsibly use protection against STDs, fine. they want to stay a virgin till marriage? fine. they're a virgin because they don't feel like having sex just yet? also fine.
virgin blood is actually a term signifying the blood of a person that has never been sacrificed before. it has nothing to do with sexuality. it's just 'fresh blood that has never been used in rituals before'. as for dragons and maidens... i seriously doubt about it since dragons aren't really known as experts in gynecology.
What we really need to sacrifice and bleed out until it dies is our bigoted, pathetic views on the impact one's sexual experiences have on their abilities, personality, etc. Because, lemme tell ya, an asshole who got laid is still an asshole and a nice person who has never even touched anyone sexually is a nice person nonethelss. don't let society decide your worth based on some stupid criteria like how many people you got naked with.
i may have expressed the thought awkwardly. usually, at some sort of rituals, the 'sacrifice' has to spill some blood, be tied to a pole or whatever. they don't get killed, i mean, that's murder, not to mention you lose a fellow worshipper. if virgin blood is required, however, you need a new person every time.... which is cool, because if you're leading a cult, you'd probably want to bring more and more people in it. the old 'sacrifices' stay in the gang and new people join in (those can be used as 'virgin blood')... .or at least that's as much as i know about this stuff.
surely, there has to be rituals that require killing but i think there's a bit more ancient hoodoo involved, not just your everyday satanism or something. The Maya would come to mind...
Okay, the sacrifice thing was a joke, but thanks for explaining nonetheless. You're right that way too many people consider virginity as a factor that apparently decides your worth, though. This is funny, in the Middle Ages a non-virgin woman was unfit for marriage, while a virgin was considered okay. Now, virgins are considered losers and non-virgins okay. The tables have turned, massively.
The fucking tables need to get turned over and this shit about virginity deciding a person's worth has to be burried headfirst in some really really deep hole. It's 21st century and we're judging people by their skin colour, accent, use of genitals and other moronic, superficial, ultra-stupid things. -.-
/rant
No it isn't. Stating the century means refering to the fact that throughout the centuries, humanity has evolved a lot in certain fields but kept caveman-like values in others. It means pointing out the difference between these values, and that it's wrong to evolve only in certain things but stay stupidly traditional in others. It's not a shitty argument at all, but you gotta interpret it correctly.
"caveman-like values"
"stupidly traditional"
These are your opinions and not any sort of real argument. You have proven exactly why this is a shitty argument.
I see no reason why would an argument be bad because it has opinions in it. Arguments don't have to be 100% facts, even though it certainly makes it better to have some factual sources. But opinions are fine, too, because then you can react as to why do you think the opinion is wrong.
The problem is it *only* contains opinions. It amounts to "I think things in the past were bad." That's all. And while it's fine to have that opinion, it's an almost non-existent argument in and of itself.
Honestly though, why can't people just stay the hell out of other people's sex lives?! So what if a guy/girl likes to have a lot of sex? So what if a guy/girl is a virgin? Worry about your own damn self.
"A master key is usually in the hands of one who has criminal intent"
Or just, like, the office head or something. Reality is not the movies, you know.
A pencil sharpener that sharpens any pencil is a great pencil sharpener, but a pencil that's always getting sharpened wears out too quickly.
Meaningless analogies are meaningless.
Let's get it straight, for a girl to sleep with guys it's pretty easy they don't have to do much depending on the guy however for a guy to sleep with heaps of girls he has to show many qualities that aren't in all the others, it's is so much harder to sleep with a girl than it is for a guy and that is why a guy is awarded when he gets around compared to a girl. This comment will be disliked & hidden but just think about it
You're an ass, garlog. Why should a girl not be allowed to have sex with whoever she wants? Why are guys the only ones who are allowed to be proud of their sex lives? Why are guys the only ones who are allowed to freely fuck whoever they please? Why should a human being's value and worth be relative to how many people they have or have not slept with?
"You're an ass, garlog."
And you're welcome to your opinion.
"Why should a girl not be allowed to have sex with whoever she wants?"
She is. And other people are allowed to have an opinion on her promiscuity.
"Why are guys the only ones who are allowed to be proud of their sex lives?"
They're not. Women can be proud too. There's no law against that.
"Why should a human being's value and worth be relative to how many people they have or have not slept with?"
It doesn't have to. I certainly don't whores are worth less as people.
alxx how could you honestly think that screwing a lot of guys is fine.Let me tell you a little something know as being fucking pregnant.I hope you really realize that even if she uses condoms there still is a chance that she gets pregnant.When she does.Guess what.She has to go and have an abortion.Not only is that painful it is also sad since it's her son/daughter.If she does think about keeping the kid she still needs to pay for it and she could also die during childbirth.
So men shouldn't take any responsibility for getting a girl pregnant? It takes two people to make a baby, you know. If a guy goes around having sex with a bunch of girls he could potentially get ALL of them pregnant. A kid is just as much the father's responsibility as it is the mother's. However, the risk of pregnancy is completely irrelevant here. What someone does in their private life is none of your business, nor mine. There are plenty of other contraceptives other than condoms, if that's your main concern. If a girl wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business? If a guy wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business? That's right, it's not.
"If a girl wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business?"
Because it is preferable for one to put his penis in a vagina that has had few or no other penises inside of it, than to put it into a vagina that has had many penises inside of it.
"If a guy wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business?"
Because he will tell me about it, and it will be awesome.
"That's right, it's not."
Answering your own question is silly.
"Because it is preferable for one to put his penis in a vagina that has had few or no penises inside of it" So all girls should do everything to please men? They should watch everything they do just to make sure they don't upset any future suitors? Bullshit. And I don't know if you're new to this planet, but most guys here on earth will have sex with pretty much any girl, regardless of how many sexual partners they've had. I'd also like to point out that women also prefer men who have not put their penis into a fuck-ton of vaginas, so that logic works both ways, dipshit. The point is, you do not have the authority nor the audacity to tell another person (whether male or female) what their sexual life should be like.
"any of your business" /= "all girls should do everything to please men They should watch everything they do just to make sure they don't upset any future suitors"
"And I don't know if you're new to this planet, but most guys here on earth will have sex with pretty much any girl, regardless of how many sexual partners they've had."
Lol, are you saying men don't have standards?
"I'd also like to point out that women also prefer men who have not put their penis into a fuck-ton of vaginas, so that logic works both ways"
That's irrelevant to both your questions and my answers.
"dipshit"
Ad hominem.
"The point is, you do not have the authority"
I have a mouth, free will and live in a free country. That's all the authority I need to tell people what they should do, if I so choose. They don't have to comply if they don't want to, though.
"audacity"
I don't think you know what that word means.
No, I am not implying men don't have standards. I am simply stating that, if offered sex from a girl they find attractive, most men aren't going to let her number of sexual partners stand in their way. "That's irrelevant to both your questions and my answers." How is that irrelevant? You stated that it's not okay for women to sleep with a bunch of men simply because most men don't find it attractive. I then, in turn, stated that most women also don't find it attractive for men to sleep with a lot of women. If that sort of "the opposite sex doesn't like it, therefore you shouldn't do it" type of logic is applicable to women, it seems awfully hypocritical of you to think that it shouldn't also apply to men.
Who cares if it's an ad hominem? I think "dipshit" is a perfectly accurate description of you, considering the hypocritical, flawed logic you keep reiterating in all of these comments.
"No, I am not implying men don't have standards. I am simply stating that, if offered sex from a girl they find attractive, most men aren't going to let her number of sexual partners stand in their way. "
That still sounds a lot like you think men have low standards, but it's better, so I'll leave it alone.
"How is that irrelevant?"
Your questions were "If a girl wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business?" and "If a guy wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business?". What women don't like isn't relevant to why I would be concerned with those things.
"the opposite sex doesn't like it, therefore you shouldn't do it"
I never said this.
"Who cares if it's an ad hominem?"
Ad hominem is pointless in debate, and reflects poorly on the one who says it.
What we really need to sacrifice and bleed out until it dies is our bigoted, pathetic views on the impact one's sexual experiences have on their abilities, personality, etc. Because, lemme tell ya, an asshole who got laid is still an asshole and a nice person who has never even touched anyone sexually is a nice person nonethelss. don't let society decide your worth based on some stupid criteria like how many people you got naked with.
surely, there has to be rituals that require killing but i think there's a bit more ancient hoodoo involved, not just your everyday satanism or something. The Maya would come to mind...
/rant
"stupidly traditional"
These are your opinions and not any sort of real argument. You have proven exactly why this is a shitty argument.
Or just, like, the office head or something. Reality is not the movies, you know.
Meaningless analogies are meaningless.
Being a slut is easy.
Mystery solved.
And you're welcome to your opinion.
"Why should a girl not be allowed to have sex with whoever she wants?"
She is. And other people are allowed to have an opinion on her promiscuity.
"Why are guys the only ones who are allowed to be proud of their sex lives?"
They're not. Women can be proud too. There's no law against that.
"Why should a human being's value and worth be relative to how many people they have or have not slept with?"
It doesn't have to. I certainly don't whores are worth less as people.
Because it is preferable for one to put his penis in a vagina that has had few or no other penises inside of it, than to put it into a vagina that has had many penises inside of it.
"If a guy wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business?"
Because he will tell me about it, and it will be awesome.
"That's right, it's not."
Answering your own question is silly.
"And I don't know if you're new to this planet, but most guys here on earth will have sex with pretty much any girl, regardless of how many sexual partners they've had."
Lol, are you saying men don't have standards?
"I'd also like to point out that women also prefer men who have not put their penis into a fuck-ton of vaginas, so that logic works both ways"
That's irrelevant to both your questions and my answers.
"dipshit"
Ad hominem.
"The point is, you do not have the authority"
I have a mouth, free will and live in a free country. That's all the authority I need to tell people what they should do, if I so choose. They don't have to comply if they don't want to, though.
"audacity"
I don't think you know what that word means.
Who cares if it's an ad hominem? I think "dipshit" is a perfectly accurate description of you, considering the hypocritical, flawed logic you keep reiterating in all of these comments.
That still sounds a lot like you think men have low standards, but it's better, so I'll leave it alone.
"How is that irrelevant?"
Your questions were "If a girl wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business?" and "If a guy wants to have a bunch of sex, why is that any of your business?". What women don't like isn't relevant to why I would be concerned with those things.
"the opposite sex doesn't like it, therefore you shouldn't do it"
I never said this.
"Who cares if it's an ad hominem?"
Ad hominem is pointless in debate, and reflects poorly on the one who says it.