Despite the fact that neither of them live in jungles, the lion would still be the king. Put a lion and a donkey in an area together and see why lions are kings.
it's funny how i've never actually seen a donkey work. has anyone been that lucky or donkeys just don't work, at all? could it be possibly this lecture or whatever it is would be better fit unwritten since it makes zero sense?
Donkeys are better than horses for hauling. Horses are faster but tire easily when hauling heavy loads, where as the donkey can sustain a decent pace for much longer than the horse. So this post makes 100000% sense in that regard, besides the habitats of the animals in question.
Well, the donkey works for the humans who pay its work with shelter and food. If hard times hit the "animal kingdom", the donkey would have a higher chance of survival because of its ability to adapt and cooperate with humans.
Unless the humans ate the donkey for meat, in which case it'd still probably have a shorter and less painful death than the lion, that'd likely die of starvation.
This post is a trainwreck.
Unless the humans ate the donkey for meat, in which case it'd still probably have a shorter and less painful death than the lion, that'd likely die of starvation.