Yes, he meant that he thinks that the alleged rapist is a very bad person, not deserving of being treated nicely. Still doesn't mean killing him is justified.
Sometimes you have to choose between doing something terrible with positive consequences or not doing anything, leaving the world as messed up as it is. I think people should stop shying away from death, because sometimes it turns out to be beneficial, like in this case.
But let's not kill tho because people are gonna think we can kill know.
▼
deleted
· 9 years ago
I don't think I murder someone (but I am very proud of this man) but I could definitely kill to protect my children, myself, or my dogs. Wouldn't even think twice.
First of all the molester didn't kill anybody so don't take it to that level. And killing in general is a pretty terrible thing but for some people you have to do it. But in this case I wouldn't approve of killing the guy but take it into my own hands by knocking him out and then take him to the police.
He said the justice system wasn't doing anything.
And yes, he didn't kill anyone but if you're molested as a child that shit scars you for life. It ruins you and a lot of people who have gone through that self harm or kill themselves. Most need therapy.
This guy did the right thing by preventing more children from a horrible future.
Yeah I know that's why I said to take him to the police so they could arrest him. And I don't think there really is a right way to handle this situation, it's really just what you personally think is the best thing to do.
Dude do you understand what I'm saying ?
He said the JUSTICE SYSTEM was doing nothing. Once the police arrest him he can either get out on bail or not. But then he would then again be let free because that's what the JUSTICE systemnis doing. Police don't just arrest you and you go to jail forever. Everyone goes through a trial.
Yes I know, I read that, he has a chance of getting free but that's why you play it smart, get evidence on him and then you get him incarcerated. I know how it works. We have 2 different ways of doing things. Doesn't mean I'm wrong and you're right, doesn't mean I'm right and you're wrong. I'm just gonna leave it at that because we clearly aren't gonna change each other's minds on the matter
Killing people who do nothing but hurt people for their own sick pleasure ( not including bdsm because it's consensual ) really shouldn't be among us. And in prison everything is taken care of for them because our taxes go to it.
And even in prison there's a chance for them to escape and start up again. Is it really so bad that someone stops a killer before they mass murder people ? It's like Robin Hood. Doing a bad thing for a good reason.
@cracker82
No, because that would be pre-crime.
@underyourbed
Robin Hood was a thief and a murderer. If he had been caught and jailed/executed it would have been justified.
I'm talking about the fluffed up version. He stole from the rich because he poor were RIDICULOUSLY poor and the rich didn't do anything about it. There was obviously some more but I'm talking about the more common version.
1Reply
deleted
· 9 years ago
Which would you prefer, a bunch of kids permanently and horrifically traumatized or one dead man? Put the needs of the many over the needs of the few
So, Garlog, are you basically saying you shouldn't kill someone from a crime they MIGHT commit even though chances are they will do it again because they are currently doing it.
If people can get thrown into jail with no evidence against them, JUST BECAUSE THEY have past history of DIFFERENT crimes, I'm pretty sure that they can kill someone because they have been traumatizing kids. And that shit stays with them for YEARS AND YEARS. It's better to stop it before it happens than let it.
@ericar1993
It's still pre-crime.
@underyourbed
I agree with the first sentence, but I don't know what your second sentence is trying to say. Are you saying that people can get thrown in jail with no evidence against them? And what does their ability to kill people have to do with it?
▼
deleted
· 9 years ago
Fine, if you don't wanna acknowledge what he would do in the future then at least acknowledge that he already molested at least 3 kids and he wasn't being punished for it
People who hurt children are the lowest form of life. Castration and death in my opinion. This man did the right thing. And the other guy got what he deserved!!!
Okay. So they mentally scar a child ( at least one ) and you feel all they should get is 7 years in prison ? Even OTHER criminals would kill a child molester so guards have to lie about their crime.
And out prisoner system doesn't include rehabilitation so they'll probably cntinue on their terrible merry way.
I'd like to the same, but in a way so that I wouldn't be caught.
This guy is a hero even though he kinda killed someone
And yes, he didn't kill anyone but if you're molested as a child that shit scars you for life. It ruins you and a lot of people who have gone through that self harm or kill themselves. Most need therapy.
This guy did the right thing by preventing more children from a horrible future.
He said the JUSTICE SYSTEM was doing nothing. Once the police arrest him he can either get out on bail or not. But then he would then again be let free because that's what the JUSTICE systemnis doing. Police don't just arrest you and you go to jail forever. Everyone goes through a trial.
And even in prison there's a chance for them to escape and start up again. Is it really so bad that someone stops a killer before they mass murder people ? It's like Robin Hood. Doing a bad thing for a good reason.
No, because that would be pre-crime.
@underyourbed
Robin Hood was a thief and a murderer. If he had been caught and jailed/executed it would have been justified.
If people can get thrown into jail with no evidence against them, JUST BECAUSE THEY have past history of DIFFERENT crimes, I'm pretty sure that they can kill someone because they have been traumatizing kids. And that shit stays with them for YEARS AND YEARS. It's better to stop it before it happens than let it.
It's still pre-crime.
@underyourbed
I agree with the first sentence, but I don't know what your second sentence is trying to say. Are you saying that people can get thrown in jail with no evidence against them? And what does their ability to kill people have to do with it?
Kill a man, and he dies. Cripple or blinding him would be much riskier, and much less permanent.
And out prisoner system doesn't include rehabilitation so they'll probably cntinue on their terrible merry way.