It looks like an alright idea,but why put the idea into Ghostbusters instead of an original film? Why fix what isn't broken,and then insult people who ask those questions?
Maybe they aren't trying to fix it, just make a sequel that they hope will get more views, because some people might want to see what Ghostbusters is like with women.
Most reboots are terrible. The fact that the characters are women has not really helped it either, with all this outrage against changing the status quo.
Oh you're THAT guest. Great. Please excuse me while I throw up my lungs. God, you're one of the most vile idiots I've ever seen on this site. When's your fucking expiration date already?
Can I go fuck myself tho for every time I have to comment with a guest profile for all these neonazis and other pedos who use the guest profile to say retarded shit? Sorry for going off topic, but seriously what is with all these guests who are just 100% cancer?
Then why are you so afraid to use that account? It's probably because you don't have the balls to stick to your beliefs, so you spew them anonymously. This makes you comparable to an animal, only more worthless.
The problem is not that the cast is genderswapped, it's that they picked bad actors. Not only that, whenever someone tried to make a criticism of the movie, the producers just called them sexist bigots, even if the complaint had nothing to do with the female main characters. It's just going to be a horrible movie IMO.
I think Burnie on the recent Roosterteeth podcast sums it up well. He says that it is an ok movie and it is worth seeing, but is does have issues.
Not in that it is an all female cast, that point of discussion is essentially irrelevant. The feeling I get from his "review" is that it wasn't written well enough for the premise that they were going for. That the charecters could have been better represented.
He says the movie was also trying too hard in places to be self referential, to the point where some scenes come off as feeling forced. Which is odd, because the whole thing is presented as though the original two films never happened. This puts it in the reboot category, which has become a four letter word when reviewing films.
I was already planning to see it and what Burnie has to say I find reassuring.
The real test of that movie will be in its sequel.
There will be ideas taken from the original movie in this first one, but the sequel is going to have to be competitively original.
Correct...your commentary made me laugh out loud. http://pinkie.mylittlefacewhen.com/media/f/img/mlfw1611-brohoof.gif
Not in that it is an all female cast, that point of discussion is essentially irrelevant. The feeling I get from his "review" is that it wasn't written well enough for the premise that they were going for. That the charecters could have been better represented.
He says the movie was also trying too hard in places to be self referential, to the point where some scenes come off as feeling forced. Which is odd, because the whole thing is presented as though the original two films never happened. This puts it in the reboot category, which has become a four letter word when reviewing films.
I was already planning to see it and what Burnie has to say I find reassuring.
There will be ideas taken from the original movie in this first one, but the sequel is going to have to be competitively original.