No. Survivability should be the key factor in deciding whether someone gets a donor organ or not. A child should get priority over an old man. An otherwise healthy person should get priority over a terminal cancer patient. That sort of stuff.
Normal people? Does that make organ donors abnormal? Somehow, this is like saying only previous blood donors should receive blood in an emergency. The one should not depend on the other.
As a non-donor, I would totally understand if it worked this way. The reasons I'd like to keep my organs are more or less appliable the other way around and I would live (or die) without becoming hypocrit. (and if charity was to be awarded in other domains in life, it wouldn't be bad either).
Yes.
Please let alcoholics sign up to be organ donors. Because it only makes sense that they're prioritized for new livers when they're unable to donate theirs...
Please let alcoholics sign up to be organ donors. Because it only makes sense that they're prioritized for new livers when they're unable to donate theirs...