We could do that in America every time an SJW tries to do one of the following
- a celebrity dies so they try to list every possible negative thing about them, be it true or not
- every time they say something is (blank)phobic but not outright hate speech
- has bright ass hair and those 50s glasses ( bonus money if they're severely overweight and/or identifies as non binary )
- they tell a minority they have internalized (blank)phobia because they don't agree with them
Also, bad news: SJWs totally love veterans. We keep campaigning for better VA centers, Honestly, if you want to donate to something that'll piss SJWs off, you're going to need to restrict your donations to benefit only cisgender, heterosexual, fully abled, economically advantaged white males. May I suggest "doing nothing to alter the status quo", which most people who bag on "SJWs" are already doing, and it pisses SJWs off pretty well.
So, basically, in order to care about vets, one can't care about the problems of any *non-vet* people groups? Caaaaaause one of the people who's been the biggest help with some friends of mine with PTSD happens to be that good at it because.... he's a vet, who's suffered (and occasionally still does) with PTSD. Somehow, I don't think he considers this to be trivializing his own problems.
Also, note: Totally not suggesting that you not donate to Veteran-related charities. Just pointing out it ain't a great way to piss us off.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=content.view&cpid=531
^ this. And also, let's not forget that everybody has a lot of different social categories that apply to them. There are plenty of vets who are nonwhite, gay, trans, female, low income, disabled, suffer from mental health issues etc. Especially the last two because combat. I feel like advocating for better care/accommodations for mental health and disabilities would benefit vets a lot and is the least we can do since they got hurt protecting us.
that is horrible. it nothing more than a move to bias peoples view and shut down conversation. it is like saying "you are being dramatic" in the view of the bystander the person being "dramatic" is now viewed as the aggressor. she is doing nothing more than making people assume he is lying even though he may not be. it is a sick trick to fool the bystander and to make herself look better. side note i know nothing about these two or what they stand for. i am going off entirely on the game she is playing.
Thanks for admitting that.
Nothing to see here, folks.
1
deleted
· 7 years ago
that i know nothing about these people and what they stand for? you are welcome...? my point is that she is purposely trying to manipulate peoples perception. this is a horrible move. it would be far more tasteful if she would go through a fact checker, THEN donate money. that is assuming that Austria's fact checkers are better than American's. again she is making something serious into a joke and manipulate the minds of the viewers. what kind of person plays that game?
- a celebrity dies so they try to list every possible negative thing about them, be it true or not
- every time they say something is (blank)phobic but not outright hate speech
- has bright ass hair and those 50s glasses ( bonus money if they're severely overweight and/or identifies as non binary )
- they tell a minority they have internalized (blank)phobia because they don't agree with them
Also, note: Totally not suggesting that you not donate to Veteran-related charities. Just pointing out it ain't a great way to piss us off.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=content.view&cpid=531
Nothing to see here, folks.