There you go. If your kid wants a fish after seeing this movie, it's obvious that it didn't get the story. But it seems to be easier to buy an animal which nobody is looking after three weeks later than explaining the intension of the film...
no wonder the world is fucked if people would rather buy their kids pet fish that actually raise them (raise the kids, not the fish). are they expecting the fish to knock some sense in their little heads?
personally i believe the two movies aren't that hard to understnad even if you're little but if a kid doesn't get it, i guess you sit them down and talk it through with them so they'll grow to be a better person!?
i also understand that kids WANT waht they see in movies so up you go and buy a plush blue tag, clownfish, a fucking plush mollusc if necessary, have your kid make a fish out of papiermache, draw it, fucking get fake washable fish tattoos if necessary. kids need limits. buying them a fish stolen from the ocean is NOT providing them with limits.
And Finding Nemo, which featured a Blue Tang as a main character, came out in 2003. They aren't saying it's happened ( even though it has been ) but they're warning people not to because similar things HAVE happened
personally i believe the two movies aren't that hard to understnad even if you're little but if a kid doesn't get it, i guess you sit them down and talk it through with them so they'll grow to be a better person!?
i also understand that kids WANT waht they see in movies so up you go and buy a plush blue tag, clownfish, a fucking plush mollusc if necessary, have your kid make a fish out of papiermache, draw it, fucking get fake washable fish tattoos if necessary. kids need limits. buying them a fish stolen from the ocean is NOT providing them with limits.