The Emergency Medical and Treatment Labor Act (EMTLA) passed by Congress in 1986 explicitly forbids the denial of care to indigent or uninsured patients based on a lack of ability to pay.
Better than being dead, and there's nothing stopping you from improving your own economic situation. Unless you're dead, in which case it doesn't really matter anymore.
People in countries with 'free' healthcare still pay for it but through taxes rather than at the point of use, it just gives a bit of protection to the most vulnerable people in our societies.
To be fair I don't think anyone in countries with free-at-the-point-of-use healthcare is ever going to understand the mentality of paid healthcare countries and vice versa. It seems to be a completely different society and way of thinking, a good example of why you can't just pick and choose the best bits of other countries and try and shoe horn them into another country.
That's a different issue. Education has repercussions that go far beyond the individual. That's what taxes are supposed to be for, like roads, libraries, or emergency services.
As I said I don't think either of us will 'get' the other person's viewpoint. To me, lots of people who can't prioritise healthcare are valuable members of society who I would like to keep alive and healthy and I don't mind my taxes going towards that.
To you, it's an each for their own world where people exist independently from society, apart from when they're providing services such as teaching, maintaining roads or in the emergency services. (Tongue firmly in cheek for my interpretation of your view by the way!)
ON YOUR WEDDING DAY
I guess it works for some people, but god help those on the poverty line
To you, it's an each for their own world where people exist independently from society, apart from when they're providing services such as teaching, maintaining roads or in the emergency services. (Tongue firmly in cheek for my interpretation of your view by the way!)