Kill the infamy and the number of incidents will drop. That's what the fuckers want anyways: to screw over as many people as possible and to be remembered for it.
Are you going to take over global news? Even if you somehow controlled all the media in the entire US (Hello state media; 1st step on the path to fascism right there).. you still can't stop the BBC, Al Jazeera, CGTN, KH, or any number of foreign news sources from airing it.
I agree with that... I'm just saying that it's impossible. That would be on the level of the entire world agreeing that the moon landings were a hoax. If our enemies could prove we are BSing our own population, they are 100% going to do it... so either they get famous here, or they get famous over there and then have the added bonus of tickling a bunch of tin foil hats over here along the way; either way it'll be exposed.
Sometimes you mix up my statements, so I'll be clear on this: The moon landing happened... it was not a hoax... if anybody could prove it wrong, they would have. That's my point.
so what do you do? not publish their names? Sweep it under the rug and act like that will fix the problem?
Let's take the problem down a notch: Firecrackers in a mailbox. If you catch the kid planting the firecrackers do you warn your neighbors? Yeah. Do you punish the kid? Yeah. Do you punish the kids with him while he did it? If there were any there, yeah. I agree you don't put the kid on national news for 2 weeks straight; but you can bet that information is going to get around the neighborhood one way or the other and there isn't a goddamn thing that can be done about that.
What makes this case in particular so tragic is that it wasn't just kids trying to point out to authorities that "yo this fucker has a firecracker"... it's the failure on everyone around them to do anything about it.
In short, I don't think it's about infamy... there are easier ways to achieve even more infamy with an AR-15 and less bloodshed. This is about neglect. Neglect by everyone around. -->
I don't want to point fingers, but a part of the spike, besides just population growth, has also coincided with the dissolution of a family unit. When both mom and dad are working, the kid is... well... I lived that, they build their own space. I think I did good with mine, filling it with friends I could play dinosaur tag with.. or regular tag... then hoop or draw.. but some kids get fucked. I know this because I screwed over one of those kids... and honestly, I'm shocked he didn't wind up shooting up our school bus at the very least.
Actually, America pretty much is racism capital. You can't have a melting pot without a few fringe groups hating the shit out of each other... especially when quite a few have been systematically repressed by a hypocritical third of our country.
See thats what i dont get people call the country with the best opportunity for economic movement in the world racist compared to say russia where they openly beat you if they do not like you or your ideals? How many european nations have racism movements especially now in a time of large migration both germany and france do guaranteed. Im sorry but i fail to see im a current world how our country shows itself to be worse off than others in the world. Another example check south africa they literally are killing all white people for being white due to history.
Im saying contrary to the idea of us being the racist capital which both of them have agreed is true we do not have it as bad as a lot of countries who openly kill people for just walking through the street with the wrong skin color like russia, most the middle east, some parts of africa.
Let's take your South Africa example. Do you have cities in South Africa filled with 30 different Southeast Asian "races" with bad blood? Or 30 different latino "races" with bad blood? Are they then all mixed in with each other so they piss each other off over stupid reasons? Add in some salt and pepper and stir with another 30 middle eastern "races" and you will eventually get a good soup that is very flavorful for 95% of it... but that 5% at the bottom where all the spices all settle like when you microwave ramen? That 5% is... ugh. But you gotta live with that 5% if you want to microwave that other 95% of good tasting ramen.
Just saying they are openly going to white peoples houses and raping pillaging and murdering all of them for skin color alone. My moms best friend fled from it so she wouldnt be raped and killed.
is it happening between 90 different racial groups? Or just white/black? Is it Black/white/black/white/black/white/black/korean/black/white/black/white?
Yeah cause i fail to see how it proves a point. Because it is more complex and has more systems it is more racist. Like racism is some measurable thing when it comes to complexity? How is it you just assume more racism equals more racist behavior?
Idk why you keep making the jump from more races to more racism. 10 different people in 2 rooms one with all different races and 1 with half kkk and half black panthers does that mean the one with more races has more racial tension and prejudice feelings?
Make a monument with the victim's names done on memorial with the piece of shit murder buried in the center that serves as a public rest area for people and pets. Let the victim's families put their loved ones stories on the bricks that make the monument. Sell a section where people can buy bricks to say whatever they want to about the scum murder. Humiliate the for eternity while everyone gets a chance to piss on their grave.
build an open ended sewer specifically for public urination. I'm actually 100% down with that.
1Reply
deleted
· 6 years ago
· FIRST
Oh yes, one conservative news outlet stopping attention on something like a school shooter, which many main news outlets aren't going to stop reporting.
So powerful.
Just because they won't doesn't mean others won't
Even then, he makes sense. You get people who want to copycat to get the fame, and knowing their name and face will be everywhere for weeks helps drive them to commit a crime like that
Let us say CNN, MSNBC, Hufflepuff, WP, NYT, and even the fucking Onion stopped...
Do you REALLY think that would stop Fox, Breitbart, The Federalist, National Enquirer, The NY Post.. etc from then turning it all backwards and then pointing them out for stopping?
Even if you got all them to stop... Do you think it would then stop Al Jazeera or BBC?
The idea is 100% right, but at this point the cat is out of the bag... turning a blind eye is just as stupid as saying confiscating a bunch of guns is the answer. Actually, trying either would just exasperate the situation. We fucked ourselves.
Again you still have to start somewhere. It does not matter if other people won't, you still should. The mentality of, nobody else will stop so i won't either, is how this problem gets out of control.
Sometimes you mix up my statements, so I'll be clear on this: The moon landing happened... it was not a hoax... if anybody could prove it wrong, they would have. That's my point.
Let's take the problem down a notch: Firecrackers in a mailbox. If you catch the kid planting the firecrackers do you warn your neighbors? Yeah. Do you punish the kid? Yeah. Do you punish the kids with him while he did it? If there were any there, yeah. I agree you don't put the kid on national news for 2 weeks straight; but you can bet that information is going to get around the neighborhood one way or the other and there isn't a goddamn thing that can be done about that.
What makes this case in particular so tragic is that it wasn't just kids trying to point out to authorities that "yo this fucker has a firecracker"... it's the failure on everyone around them to do anything about it.
In short, I don't think it's about infamy... there are easier ways to achieve even more infamy with an AR-15 and less bloodshed. This is about neglect. Neglect by everyone around. -->
So powerful.
Just because everyone doesn't do it en masse at once doesn't mean it won't help
Not a chance.
Even then, he makes sense. You get people who want to copycat to get the fame, and knowing their name and face will be everywhere for weeks helps drive them to commit a crime like that
Do you REALLY think that would stop Fox, Breitbart, The Federalist, National Enquirer, The NY Post.. etc from then turning it all backwards and then pointing them out for stopping?
Even if you got all them to stop... Do you think it would then stop Al Jazeera or BBC?
The idea is 100% right, but at this point the cat is out of the bag... turning a blind eye is just as stupid as saying confiscating a bunch of guns is the answer. Actually, trying either would just exasperate the situation. We fucked ourselves.