The model is an object. The “owner” is the booth worker. Permission didn’t have to be asked because they specifically told you to put the condom on their property. If a human said: “put this condom on my penis” that is permission. They obviously wanted to teach and make people think about consent, however they didn’t go about it right. At the very least such a scenario would require instructions and role play, since the penis model can’t give permission to put a condon on it as it is an object. In other words, you are not a rapist, you’re just not great at improvisational role play under those circumstances. The question asked is arguably a crappy teacher- although their method could be said to work as you still remember to this day to ask consent before putting on a condom.
@guest_ Sometimes, I read your posts and I think to myself, ‘Aw, fuck yeah... fuck YEAH! Take your reasonable and well-thought out posts and stick them as far into my brain as you can get them, mate! Make me formulate second-order conclusions that I couldn’t have gotten to on my own! Expand the FS dialogue while also making me think! Philosophize me just like you were doing - don’t slow down, buddy, don’t stop! Oh fuck, I’ve never had someone expound and extol so much logic on me like this before! Don’t stop enlightening me like this! Keep analyzing for me! Keep theorizing for me! Oh, my god! Oh, my god! OH. MY. GOD! YES!!!’
And then I’m like... no homo.
And then I’m like... no homo.
Seriously? If I were that guy I’d have become a murderer too, by now.