I think it's a neat painting. What I dislike is some pretentious art explanation that doesn't mean a thing because the "painter" is a bird that walked/hopped on the canvas. There is no deeper meaning. No "free-flowing line" or being "evocative of the feeling of absolute freedom experienced in flight". It's a painting, by a bird. That's what makes it interesting. Most of the "art world" is full of crap anyway and we really shouldn't let them get away with it.
Comments