I know for a fact that when sperm donations take place they have you sign forms that eliminates the donors physical and financial responsibilities to the child unless both parents die and the child has no place to go
i legit don't wanna live on this planet anymore. Everything is escalating and when it comes to a point it'll all come crashing down and I don't wanna see the wreckage
It's not a small consolation. As long as its a landslide win for the dude then everything is working as intended.
You can sue people for basically anything, no matter how ridiculous. But youll get laughed out of court. You should only lose hope if the ridiculous claims start winning (or even start being close battles).
I was trying to find out more about this and ended up reading about a sperm donor attempting to sue for parental rights, along with the denial for a paternity request due in part to:
.
"presumption of legitimacy”—a legal term for the general assumption that a child born to a husband and wife is the biological child of both parents—extends to same-sex couples as well"
.
I understand what they're trying to do there, but I feel like they're playing fast and loose with the term "biological" now
7Reply
deleted
· 5 years ago
So this story seems fake unless you think the site of its origin, theshitnews, sounds reliable.
There are one or two other stories about this general situation, but the reasoning is different than you'd expect. In those cases, the men had donated sperm directly from himself to the couples, and since it was outside of sperm donation banks and not inseminated by a licensed physician etc, it was not legally recognized as him no longer having parental claim. Furthermore, the couples split up and the mother with the child would then go to the state for support and it was the state that would contact the men
You can sue people for basically anything, no matter how ridiculous. But youll get laughed out of court. You should only lose hope if the ridiculous claims start winning (or even start being close battles).
.
"presumption of legitimacy”—a legal term for the general assumption that a child born to a husband and wife is the biological child of both parents—extends to same-sex couples as well"
.
I understand what they're trying to do there, but I feel like they're playing fast and loose with the term "biological" now
There are one or two other stories about this general situation, but the reasoning is different than you'd expect. In those cases, the men had donated sperm directly from himself to the couples, and since it was outside of sperm donation banks and not inseminated by a licensed physician etc, it was not legally recognized as him no longer having parental claim. Furthermore, the couples split up and the mother with the child would then go to the state for support and it was the state that would contact the men