Not gonna talk about gender stuff right here. Going to talk about business, because in my long career I see this a lot and it’s always a pet peeve. When you are working at a high level of management- you aren’t making decisions months out. It’s in years. Big companies tend to move slow. A major project can take months or more just to see if it’s working. Things like business maps etc. can take YEARS just to start working or begin. Unless you’ve COMPLETELY gone belly up, things like closures aren’t done months ahead. They’re being talked about and planned in contingency well in advance. There’s a lot to work out from supply chain to legal and more. A large company is like a freighter. You can’t jerk the wheel and turn on a dime, you have to start turning miles before you plan to turn.
SKIP TO HERE TO MISS PREAMBLE.
So when a new leader of a large organization starts up in business- politics- whatever- If you suddenly see some huge turn around, if things start going really well all of a sudden: that’s almost always going to be the work that was done before they came on. Same when it goes bad. Why do you think they fired the old CEO? Because he was doing great? No. He got fired because things were taking a shit. They bring in someone new to clean it up. Part of cleaning up when things are royalty hosed often involves stopping the bleeding before you can turn things around. Sadly- the new person often does great, but results take time and they get sacked for being ineffective. A new person takes over and those changes start paying off and the new person looks like a miracle worker.
FINAL ADVICE: Unless you’re good and know how to read things very well- in “big folk jobs” you don’t want to take a job right after a screw up. You’ll get blamed for things going bad and likely get sacked, and the next person gets the kudos for your work. Business as a ship means knowing when to stay a course. Being impulsive doesn’t tend to work well most of the time. High level management can take a year just to settle in and catch up. You have to give changes time. This is true in anything from planes to electronics projects to exercise. If you get impatient you aren’t seeing results right away and keep changing things up- you won’t see results. You have to give something enough time to see if it’s working or not. 5 months is not long in a CEO spot. 5 months you might not know who everyone is yet or what projects are what.
I think it's more than one vulture, I upvoted him too and he's still negative. I guess people just don't like truth on here.
deleted
· 4 years ago
Or it's just one person with multiple accounts, I believe FS is set up to disable comments on an account with enough downvotes on enough comments and I believe this person knows that. I don't know if that feature's still around or not since this sort of thing has happened in the past.
Thanks y’all. And yeah. I picked up at least one shadow awhile back. Not sure exactly who, but I’m sure plenty of folks also don’t like what I have to say too. That’s life. Lol.
felixo77, we didn't say anything about it being a conspiracy (that word is thrown around too much these days) just that someone or someones are purposefully downvoting guest_ for no discernible reason.
So when a new leader of a large organization starts up in business- politics- whatever- If you suddenly see some huge turn around, if things start going really well all of a sudden: that’s almost always going to be the work that was done before they came on. Same when it goes bad. Why do you think they fired the old CEO? Because he was doing great? No. He got fired because things were taking a shit. They bring in someone new to clean it up. Part of cleaning up when things are royalty hosed often involves stopping the bleeding before you can turn things around. Sadly- the new person often does great, but results take time and they get sacked for being ineffective. A new person takes over and those changes start paying off and the new person looks like a miracle worker.