Would not

Hidden 4 years ago by rentfaint · 185 Likes · 9 comments · Trending

Report

This post may contain spoilers, private information, or inappropriate content.
Login to view this post

Comments

Show More Comments

Follow Comments Sorted by time

mialinay · 4 years ago · FIRST

No would not. She looks 16 at most.

5 Reply

nicengelman · 4 years ago

I've never seen a face look so detached from its body

savage_demmigod · 4 years ago

Exactly what I was thinking
Poor girl's lost her head

4 Reply

scatmandingo · 4 years ago

Can you get around the age thing if you say “I would if I were her age”?

mialinay · 4 years ago

Hmmm. Though that might seem logical at first, it still sounds a bit pedo.

▼

scatmandingo · 4 years ago

How about “when I was her age I would have”?

rosalinas · 4 years ago

Doesn't work
Just don't follow underage girls

▼

scatmandingo · 4 years ago

I’m not following anyone, I ran across this picture the same place you did. And that answer is true. At my current age I find her to be too young for my taste by at least a decade but when I was her age I would have found her very attractive.

funkmasterrex · 4 years ago

Would I what? Push her into the water? I would.

3 Reply

Would not

Comments

Featured Posts