Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest_
· 4 years ago
· FIRST
We don’t even have to Bring race into it. Real simple and say it with me: women are people, not property. Women aren’t “for” anything. Women have all sorts of potential. They can choose to gestate a child- or not. If we want to talk race- women are free to choose whatever person they want to be the father of their child. If women aren’t choosing you- it’s probably less about race and more about you not being a person they’d want to spend time with let alone raise a kid with. Make less signs, spend more time working on you. Start by repeating over and over until you understand- women are people. They don’t exist to make any kind of baby.
21
·
Edited 4 years ago
xvarnah
· 4 years ago
Statistically, though, I will give the guy one point: white women have produced more white babies than women of any other racial group
15
·
Edited 4 years ago
guest_
· 4 years ago
Lol. I suppose they have... but.... I don’t know. So if we define a baby as “white” that has a “white” mother and father- of course by default a “white” child could only be produced through such a pairing. But.... it’s more complex than that. So... most people on earth trace their lineage through many ethnic groups and “races” going back into history- and of course- the current dominant scientific theory is that all humans originated in African- so ultimately we all share some sort of racial/ethnic riot there most likely. But.... let’s just say for the sake of simplicity that we are only speaking of a modern generality on race...
1
guest_
· 4 years ago
... “white” is HIGHLY subjective. The US census for example considers Lebanese, Arabs, and Moroccans to be “white,” and acknowledges overlap with the “Hispanic/Latino” category. Of course some people or groups are only concerned with skin color- melanin. If you lack enough to be some shade of “brown,” and aren’t considered by the speaker as “Asian” you are white- although... on skin color some consider Asians as “white” too. But if we are only talking about skin color, or ethnicity- or a combination of the two- then it is not only possible for a non “white” woman to have a “white” baby- but a non “white” father AND non “white” mother could also have a “white” child. So while I appreciate the humor of the comment- I’d have to say that the idea is not a guarantee- and depends on how the person in question wants to define “white”-
1
guest_
· 4 years ago
as like any racial grouping- it both lacks a consistent definition- or universal criteria we can use to qualify the inclusion or exclusion- and is subject to not only individual assessment- but to change by geography/culture as well as time in popular definition. Most Americans and Europeans consider “white” to refer mostly to those of Anglo European decent- but of course the official government list includes Arabs and Moroccans- which most Europeans and Americans would not consider “white”
1
bethorien
· 4 years ago
i mean function this is true simply in the fact that a white woman cannot infact make a baby that isnt white. If a white woman makes a baby with anyone who isnt white they will be at minimum half of her "whiteness" ergo a white baby lol
2
captbojangles18
· 4 years ago
He's just butthurt because a girl he liked ended up with a black guy...
4