Acshually it's beginning to be called BCE: Before Common Era
Neckbeard moment aside, no serious historian disputes the existence of a man called Christ around that time
What can be disputed is whether he was literally the Son of God
except they all do. Romans and their tax records... lack of any physical evidence, no story until at the least 40 years later.... that is a trifecta. The tax records alone; they have tax records STILL for everyone in in every town around at the time.... unless he was smuggled to a different Alexandria and changed his name (a real possibility) he didn't exist in the first place. The moral of the story is still relevant; I concede that point; does it matter one way or the other?
edit: I had a the instead of they.
Ah, so THAT's why churches are tax exempt ! They are following in Christ's footsteps. Tax evasion is a sacred ritual protected under religious freedom.
Neckbeard moment aside, no serious historian disputes the existence of a man called Christ around that time
What can be disputed is whether he was literally the Son of God
edit: I had a the instead of they.