It's true

The fucks a Dummy? And regardless, I was just complementing you on how you repeated that punchline. It was pretty cool

It's a pacifier but the uk name

Yea I just googled it. Sure gimme a dummy.

Haha man just doesn't fucking care.

We need there to be a yearly mental health inspection in order to renew gun license. We need to limit number of guns a person can have, and ban certain overpowered guns. We still need the second ammendment, but we need a way to control it.

Also in regards to recent shootings like in Chicago putting more restrictions on guns is like treating a scraped knee when you have a stab wound. Alot of these are the result of organized crime/gang violence and the criminally insane.

man just manufacture every gun with a tracking gps and if the gun is not within its registered home or on route to a shooting range (or at a shooting range) send in the swat team.

Nope they already have a better way. Ballistic fingerprints are taken of every gun manufactured in the states. Firearms leave marks on bullets that are unique like fingerprints. So if and when a bullet is recovered at a crime scene they know which gun was used.

that's after the crime happens tho lol. No point figuring out there was a shooter AFTER 30 kids die. Plus a lot of guns used by criminals are owned by someone like a friend, and are just borrowed by the shooter.

There is no proven way to prevent a crime. Civilization is over 5,000 years old and people still commit crimes. The only truly effective way to prevent a crime is police presence. Terrorism is a different animal im talking about "everyday" crimes theft, rape, murder.

yea but having a real time tracker in every gun will help decrease the number of mass shootings dude. having them hard to remove will at least SLOW the production of black market guns. slower crime rate > normal crime rate

Texasranger, other countries have put out gun legislation and their shooting crimes dropped dramatically. That's kind of "proof." Also, the 2nd Amendment was created strictly for the people of separate states to protect themselves from outside forces, not to protect the US "from itself." In fact, Shay's Rebellion is what caused them to specifically put wording into law defining "defending yourself" against the US government as treason and insurrection. I can look up the stats, but a large percentage of gun crimes are committed by people who got their guns from private sellers, who are not required to do background checks because they're not dealers. Start registering guns like cars and recording sales and I guarantee you, that dude in Missouri is going to start caring whether that guy in Illinois who wants to buy his gun has a criminal background and lost or stolen weapons will get reported a lot faster if people know their names can be linked to crimes committed with them.

yeah dude there definitely needs to be more restrictions. My problem is when people say we need to ban them all together. Like, that's dumb as fuck.

The 2nd amendment was designed to protect the people from its own government and putting a government enforced registration defeats the purpose. Im all for increased background checks go ahead do it i dont mind. And yes i can agree with thatoneguy

No, the Constitutiin does not protect against or encourage insurrection or treason, which it defines as levying war against the United States of America. The founding fathers built the Constitution and government around the citizenry being protected from the government by laws. The second amendment was added in reference to aiding the small military force against British forces. The exact same men who wrote that amendment put down and punished a citizen rebellion themselves. A democratic government, in their eyes, was one run by the people and therefore the people could not revolt against it.

I never said "any psycho could get a gun still," I said if somebody wants to kill somebody they are going to find a way. I don't know if you realize this or not but bombs, knives, and cars are all things that could kill people. Taking away one way to kill somebody won't stop killings as there are still other ways. If you take the time to read my comment you'll see I wasn't even talking about guns, I was saying the problem lies within the ill people's minds. Guns aren't the problem, their (the mentally ill people who go around mass shooting people) mindsets are the problem.

I know, and if you read mine you'd see that it really freakin is the guns. You can literally buy an assult rifle off of walmart's online store. That's how one of the school shooters did it right? I know it sucks, but you have to cater for that 1% of fucking idiots. Those psychos won't "always" find a way. We don't have that problem anywhere else in the world, because we have strict gun laws. We hardly have gun related killings, because of the freakin gun laws. Literally every country except america gets that allowing EXTREMELY dangerous weaponry is a problem. The 2nd amendmant was written when the most dangerous gun was a musket, now you can fucking get a huge ass machine gun. Yes that 1% will always TRY to find a way to murder but it makes it SO much harder without a gun store that practically offers you a freakin AR-15. The only valid argument america will ever have is "I like my guns". That's it. People reacted the EXACT same way when they were having slaves taken away.

You don't get it do you. Unlike your country its ILLEGAL to deny guns to citizens its unconstitutional end of story. Its not that simple here so get off your high horse, and accept that things work differently here. If there was a simple, easy, and effective solution we would have dont it allready. You cant just repeal an amendment of the bill of rights there would be civil war.

That ammendmant applied when the worst type of gun was a freakin musket. Calling for a ban on guns is an easy solution.

How would you implement that ban? There's not an easy way to do that.

The US can, and has, repealed Amendments to the Constitution. Just saying. Also, we fought a civil war...for some reason the losers can't accept they lost, though.

Lets say you take away all the guns from America. Problem solved right? Now somebody drives their car onto a beach killing twenty people before driving into the ocean and killing themselves. Now would you say the problem is cars? Yes, you would. You are putting the blame on the killing method rather than the killer.

And, just saying, criminals don't follow the law. Banning guns would only take them away from law obiding citizens leaving criminals with the upperhand.

Yes we have repealed amendments but none of those were in the bill of rights and those rights are inalienable say what you want but banning guns is never happening. And lindsay is right people should look to the killer not the means. @envious this has nothing to do with the civil war

Oh my soul. Cars aren't used for the primary use of killing now are they? And no, you take ALL guns away, do home searches. Safe's everything.

Currently, no, they aren't, but unless you fix the real problem (people) something will step up and replace guns.

That is such a bad argument.

People are creative and capable of such evil that if they want to kill people they will use anything a man went into a school in Sweden and slashed up atudents with a sword. A woman in las vegas killed 6 and injured dozens when she drove intentionally on the sidewalk. Men in china also stabbed dozens. In the UK people still get murdered every day with knives and other weapons. Its really arrogant to think that just because it worked for you itll work for everyone else. Things are different here get over it.

But their crime late is so much lower. And no it doesn't happen everyday.

China's crime rate is so much lower? lolz

Hmmm....crazy person kills 40 people with large magazine weapon, or crazy person kills 20 people with a car. Well shit, he's gonna kill people anyway, may as well let him have the other twenty!

Id prefer nobody die at all but thats not going to happen

But you guys have school shootings regularly, with guns that are legally bought. Huge unnecassary gunz

Regularly?? Bro idk what kinda jumped up shit news service you have but there are fewer shootings than you think. And no half the guns that are used weren't bought by the shooter they were stolen from a family member or friend. And they aren't huge ass guns they are fairly "normal" guns...by american standards its not like they rolled up with a M2 .50 machine gun mounted on a truck dude. But still its an issue and banning guns all together isn't an option here.

I think there was something like 52 school shootings in 2015 which isn't regularly but that is still a LOT. 30 were killed and 53 others were injured

Thank you thats still 83 more people with bullet wounds than there should have been.

Exactly. And taking away all guns isn't going to solve that but more regulations could.

Im all for that but they can't just be any regulations

That works out to one a week, I'd say that constitutes as regular

Yeah they can't. And yeah I'd agree with you on that than.

Tell me exactly why it won't work. People won't comply? You saod before "law abiding citizens" so tell me why they wouldn't follow this law.

Read the constitution. Its not about the guns its about the freedom to own one. Our government wrote down certain rights that they would not and could not take away and the right to bear arms is one of them. Its there because the brits tried to take away the colonists guns and to defend the people from themselves and their government. My ancestor died defending that right. Thats why we cant simply ban guns. If Obama issues an executive order bannin all firearms i guarantee you there will be riots, and open civil war people are that adament about that freedom.

The bill of rights were considered unalienable rights. They are rights people were born with and that as humans we all deserved. The founding fathers made clear that these rights were not ones to be taken away under any circumstance. We the people of the United States of America have the right to overthrow our government if they try and take away our unalienable rights. Its in the Constitution.
Law obiding or not, you know damn well you take away our guns and shit will hit the fan.

America shall fall then. You really want to abide by laws set by slave owners and white supremacists? I know why the law was written but do you know when it was written. Circumstances were waaay different back then, now all that law does is give wackos a chance at some target practice before their big day. Your founding father fought hard yes understandable, but so did fckin mine. And you know how shit their country became? We literally had a seperation of white'z and non- whites till 1994 till black people finally got rights. And now we praise those founding fathers for their gift of soleley establashing a nation but we also understand their circumstance that's why our constitution changed and it did so for a very good reason. Yours needs some changing too.

Bro we did change. We've changed countless times. More times than i can count. News flash the USA isn't South Africa. Dont make the mistake in thinking that just because something works for you itll work for other people. Get off your high horse and respect the fact WE ARE DIFFERENT! Besides you don't even fucking live here so why give a rats ass.

Because giving about other people's safety is on my fuvkin agenda.

Bro idk about you but its not a warzone here. I feel perfectly safe. And so do most people. Im willing to have a calm discussion with you truly. But i can't if we're both being close minded

When somebody close to you dies you'll figure it out that the weapon isn't the problem it's the person behind it. I'm done.

I know someone who was shot, my uncle. He didn't die but he was so close to at a point we all prepared to say goodbye. I KNOW people are the problem I really freakin do, but you have to cater for them. Because that minority of people are asses and that's that, but we have to find ways to diminish their ways of being an ass.