Because, technically, they are a religion.
The difference between a cult and a religion is that, in a cult, one guy codifies all the rules and whatnot, whereas, in a religion, that guy's dead.
It's a pretty fascinating topic actually. The Church of Scientology bombarded the IRS with so many lawsuits and actual religious experts that the government basically just gave up and handed them their tax exempt status.
I mostly agree with you. I think all religious institutions should have to pay taxes and show quarterly financial statements, but that constitutionally cannot happen. As far as the federal government is concerned, the one and only thing that makes something a religion is all important religious tax exemption.
I would agree, but most Christian churches are kept up by tithes and offering. Mega churches work a little differently, but the average Baptist church is run by donation only and they have expenses, like paying the pastor, missions raising, even utilities and groundskeeping.
Your pastor should make enough to support his family with a comfortable middle class living, and send his kids to a state school. If he makes enough to afford a private jet, something is wrong.
I'm not for "disappearing" politicians (though it often sounds soooo satisfying, the corrupt f@cks) but the argument can be made that they're tolerant people intolerant of intolerance.
The difference between a cult and a religion is that, in a cult, one guy codifies all the rules and whatnot, whereas, in a religion, that guy's dead.
Sero...numbers please.
You take pity on them.