Okay, I know it's a joke, but these two articles are about two different things. While the *different* authors disagree about whether paid family leave us beneficial overall, neither is actually a persuasive essay for or against.
The first article questions why companies like Starbucks offer paid family leave for their corporate employees, but not their retail store employees, the "everyone" in the title referring to everyone within a single company from hourly to president.
The second article cites research that is showing that, while well-intentioned, paid family leave is costing young women their jobs because they're more costly to employ compared to men or older women.
Read for yourself:
http://archive.fo/95N8hhttp://archive.fo/uH6yn
*audible laugh*
*socially unacceptable cackle*
The first article questions why companies like Starbucks offer paid family leave for their corporate employees, but not their retail store employees, the "everyone" in the title referring to everyone within a single company from hourly to president.
The second article cites research that is showing that, while well-intentioned, paid family leave is costing young women their jobs because they're more costly to employ compared to men or older women.
Read for yourself:
http://archive.fo/95N8h http://archive.fo/uH6yn