Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
domoclan12
· 5 years ago
· FIRST
As much as I don’t agree with the choice to skip the wedding, or the choice to have an abortion, it’s kinda a dick move to shove someone’s face in it after they politely said they would rather not go. It’s rude and I think they should get over themselves for their family, but that’s not exactly the response you should give if you’re trying to take the moral high ground like that
29
i_
· 5 years ago
No that's exactly what you say. You're not taking the high ground, you're showing how they voluntarily rolled to the low ground.
7
domoclan12
· 5 years ago
I see what you mean, but thats just stooping to their level, and then you both look like assholes. I don’t agree with any of the decisions made personally
11
Show All
i_
· 5 years ago
Except in stooping, your feet are still above theirs. You're just temporarily lowering your head down to someplace they can comprehend.
▼
cryoenthusiast
· 5 years ago
i'm getting a strong sense of daddy issues here
▼
guest_
· 5 years ago
The family are jerks, and wrong. But he was a jerk too. There are a million reasons why, but his logic is flawed. She got an abortion (something she believes is wrong), and now he wants her to go to a gay wedding (something she thinks is wrong.) Does it make a person a hypocrite if they do a single wrong thing and then refuse to do more, or once you make one moral mister in life you should totally abandon your values because you aren’t perfect? Who is? And don’t most major religions spend a lot of time telling people that they are flawed, they will make mistakes, and that trying to be better is as close as people get because they’ll never be perfect? So throwin her abortion in her face was not only low class, but what does it matter? If you cheated on your first girlfriend does that mean you have to help your buddy cheat on his wife 40 years later? It’s a dumb argument. She should go to his wedding because there’s no reason not to other than being a bigot- but his words were too harsh
8
chicken_nugget
· 5 years ago
She could have just left it at Keith cracked his ribs and none of the pettiness would insure from either side
17
xvarnah
· 5 years ago
This entire post was way more emotionally exhausting than I was prepared to deal with
11
celticrose
· 5 years ago
Too bad she seems to have missed the entire foundation of Christianity, which is to love one another without judgement or condition. “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Too many "christians" seem to forget this.
12
guest
· 5 years ago
She literally said she loved him and would keep him in her prayers. You can love someone without approving of their actions or compromising your beliefs.
8
celticrose
· 5 years ago
But refusing to attend his wedding, and before that refusing to respond, that's not showing love, its showing judgement. Words are easy, actions speak louder
guest_
· 5 years ago
You can love them without approving their actions, but if their actions don’t hurt anyone and make them happy, then there’s nothing to protest. Your loved one can’t live their life for you, and choosing to reject a central aspect of their life... well- if you can’t go to their wedding, you logically couldn’t go to their home, be around them and their partner, at that point you essentially have cut them out of your life- for disapproval of an action, or in this case, rejection of who they are on a fundamental level. If that’s the case you don’t love them. You live your idea of them, and when they don’t conform to your idea of who they should be, you cut them off. You live who they WOULD be to you if you didn’t know that aspect of them. And for what? Because you wouldn’t do it?
1
guest
· 5 years ago
The Auntie's response was very polite and deserved more respect.
13
guest
· 5 years ago
Suck it Aunt Diane and Uncle Keith’s ribs .. More cake for the rest of us .
1
iondrako
· 5 years ago
The part where he"calls her out on her bs" looks edited in. The chat bubble at that point changes it's shade of green and gets smaller.
10
deleted
· 5 years ago
You're right, it does
4
ajhedges
· 5 years ago
Pretty sure they had to scroll down and cut two screenshots together
1
Show All
iondrako
· 5 years ago
The text bubble wouldn't change color and side of it was just that
1
·
Edited 5 years ago
ajhedges
· 5 years ago
The text color would in fact change, I’m guessing you don’t own an iPhone
2
timebender25
· 5 years ago
The colur of the bubbles are a gradient that goes from the top of the screen to the bottom. Not just the top of the bubble to the bottom.
4
iondrako
· 5 years ago
If it was a gradient then it should still flow even with the edit. But also the bubble size gets randomly smaller
▼
timebender25
· 5 years ago
That's because they couldn't get the whole message in the screenshot. So they got half of it, scrolled down, then got the rest.
ajhedges
· 5 years ago
Yep, exactly what happened
guest
· 5 years ago
The gradient doesn’t stay constant from top to bottom it changes as you scroll so if you cut off a text scroll and take another screenshot this is exactly what it would look like
1
