Sadly no. My name was randomly generated. People knew me by that name and the site was shut down later. I kept the name. I do know its the name of a god and i think of a book as well
I’d invent a song on the spot. Being the only one who knows the song, being the composer and writer, performing it perfectly would be simple because the tone, pitch, key, rythym, etc are all decided by me. The alphabet song seems like a safe bet but it is not. You may know the words, but unless you are vocally accomplished you could easily mess up the timing, key, or pitch. Also, the concept of “perfect” for the alphabet song relies on the person with the guns judgment. Their idea may be different than yours in how it is best sung, and they may also have a different version such as- “XYZ... <end>” or “XYZ now I know my ABC’s” or “XYZ now I know my ABC’s, next time won’t you sing with me?” Or so on. Without specifying sheet music for the version, it’s subjective, and if you specify the rendition you are held to the standards as that version is written and or performed which may require some skill. Yeah. I’d make up a song.
someone that threatens people with death to make them think is most likely the kind of stupid people that would get mad at their mind puzzle getting circumvented and shoot them anyways.
But we can speculate all we want. What are their motivations? What are theor criteria for “perfect rendition?” If you want to impose realism and psychology ask wether someone who would hold a gun to your head and ask you to sing a “perfect song” Is really going to let you live at all or if they’d kill a master singer after the best performance of their life because they are obviously mentally unstable or sadistic. It’s a hypothetical situation. All we have to judge on are the criteria given- anything else you input are your own assumptions and not part of the exercise. We don’t know why the person is doing it or anything about them, there’s no context or anything to make assumptions off of. A hypothetical situation is just that- a problem which is defined by the given information. The “joe buys 100 water melons” meme/math problem as example, or “2 trains heading in opposite directions on parelele tracks traveling X speed...” you can SAY that rail regulations would require them to....
.... slow to a certain speed, or an operator would shunt one train. You can say that joe wouldn’t get all 100 water melons home because joe is clumsy- you can add whatever you want to the problem to make the answer whatever you want it to be by playing word games and guessing games and adding external factors or assumptions- but that’s counter to the point of a hypothetical scenario. The scenario assumes only the information given, and we have been told that we must sing any song of our choosing perfectly or be shot. There are no “legal system loopholes” here, only an answer within the parameters of the question. If that answer were precluded, the question would specify details to that end. The question does not, and so with the given information it is a valid answer.
"This is the song that never ends, yes it goes on and on my friend. Some people started singing it, not knowing what it was, and they'll continue singing it forever just because...This is the song that (BANG!)
What if you say you'll sing your own song, and you just make one up? What about songs with multiple different versions? Too many loop holes. I'll go with meglovania.
... Okay, you right, you right. I can respect that view on life. Heck, I mess up on purpose just to make myself laugh so making someone sing before they die sounds like comedic genius now that I look at it your way... Well played.
Comments