Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
jokur_and_batmon
· 4 years ago
· FIRST
Best I can do is student debt
1
guest_
· 4 years ago
Statistics and class. The average family- ESPECIALLY the average middle to upper class family- has much higher odds of a kid endangered by smoking or drinking than combat. The military aims for about 150,000 recruits each year- the entire military is less than one half of one percent the US population. For practical reasons- strict age restriction apply to armed service- and well... also because it’s easier to get kids to fight and die.
guest_
· 4 years ago
But of course- most families don’t have to worry about sending kids into combat- and truly well off families can pad out resumes and prestige through service done in shielded and relative safety even in times of war. The bulk of those with a voice and power are more concerned that they or their kids will get into and be able to afford a university on their way to a life of prosperity than they are that their child might come home shaking every night, or missing legs, or not at all. So those are the big issues we hear about- those that effect the majority of middle and upper class families.
guest_
· 4 years ago
As a note- at least under current law, even with federal Tobacco age raised to 21, active service military is still 18. But all in all- it’s important to note that young people die for old people’s wars- but we should also note that young people die for other young people too- and we all get the Halo. It isn’t that people don’t really care about kids dying in combat- it’s that people care more about their own lives and comfort than kids they don’t know dying in combat.
guest_
· 4 years ago
TL:dr AND conclusion: All told- trying to compare civilian law to military service is silly. That’s like pointing out a civilian can’t own cruise missiles with tactical nuclear warheads, full auto battle rifles and shoulder fired anti tank rockets. Well... yeah... I mean... it’s kinda common sense that the military would have different rules than civilian life. People drink and smoke for themselves. The military serves for the country. It isn’t some double standard- the government would rather most kids not die- but if they’re gonna die or fave life long struggle they’d rather they do it for some greater purpose than being bored on a Saturday and wanting to get a buzz.
mrscollector
· 4 years ago
Holy shit they raised to the legal age to buy cigarettes from 18 to 21! I had no idea!
1
famousone
· 4 years ago
Yeah, it's bullshit
supermappy
· 4 years ago
Give it time, the drinking age will be increased to 25. Mark my words!
zombie_slayr
· 4 years ago
I swear if I turn 21 and they change it im gonna flip. I already got denied cigs when I turned 18
guest_
· 4 years ago
Cigs you probably don’t have to worry about so much- those are getting closer to being a felony every day so pretty soon there probably won’t even be a legal way to buy them. Booze- I don’t know they’d move the legal age- or if they did that it would matter. How many people have their first drink at 21? Not many. Some sure. But at MOST I could see them raising the age to buy and consume hard liquor or alcohol over a certain proof- but I’m betting plenty of bars and nightclubs and other venues that rely on selling booze to the near 21 crowd would scream bloody murder if they blanket raised the age.
garlog
· 4 years ago
Not really equivalent things.
1