That's entirely different actually! Men wore heels for practical purposes. Sometimes everyone wore low buckley heels because that was just the fashion. But heels for fashion are inherently feminine.
First off, what do you mean by feel the pain. Woman complain that heels hurt and that they need a man taller than them when they wear heels, so why not just wear flats. Second, the first fashion heels were for both men and woman, men just decided to not wear them because they are uncomfortable. No one forces women to wear heels. Also, the heels that you think were made for men (Butchers heels) were actually not the first heels, and were closer to platform shoes than modern heels.
Ironically iirc pants and leggings started becoming more popular because MEN kept insisting on shortening their tunics to obscene lengths to show off their shapeliness.
9Reply
deleted
· 4 years ago
Weeeeeeinnnnn no girl in pants would like me weeeeeinnn.
Omg. I just went and read this guys Twitter feed and it is a bunch of INSANE conspiracy stuff about Covid-19. I feel like my brain just melted a little
11Reply
deleted
· 4 years ago
Roosh is a known misogynist who caters to the incels. He is disgusting and I despise him.
If you wanna get original on everybody then we should all be in long swaths of sheets wrapped like togas, skirts, tube tops, etc. But I doubt your smarmy ass would ever put on a skirt cause “it’s too girly”
Ok but like unironically let's bring togas back. Or anything that can be wrapped and has that nice flowy fabric. The closest thing that sorta resembles that aesthetic nowadays are those bridesmaids infinity dresses which admittedly are really cool. I just thrifted a pair of leggings and I intend to take them apart and make an infinity top/bodysuit out of them so hopefully it goes well lol
Roosh V is a former pick up artist turned religious fundamentalist. Basically, he's had his fun and now he wants to tell you that you can't. Also iirc, back in the Bible days, men wore robes and women commonly wore pants. (Not leggings obviously but y'know a tight skirt can be more provocative than a pair of palazzos so the distinction makes no sense) So Roosh, if you wanna be accurate, put on your grandma's nightgown and shut up about women wearing pants.
Roosh regrets sleeping around so much. Understandable but he never should have done it in the first place. If people want to insult him, insult him properly. Insult him for being a whore not an incel.
I'm insulting him for acting holier-than-thou even though he did all the stuff he now condemns and only changed because he got bored of his previous lifestyle and realized that it doesn't lead to emotional fulfillment. Now I'm not a believer so I won't insult him from that purity kind of angle but I'll just say that his newfound "faith" seems deeply disingenuous. He used to pander to the edgyboi biotruther atheist crowd, now he panders to the traditionalists and reactionaries because it seems there's more of them these days and it's a more lucrative way to send his horrible books. He's just a fraud.
Not even close. This guy is an absolute whore. Or maybe I should say was, because he seems to have been regretting it recently. But he used to sleep around a lot and it was really disgusting. I obviously agree with him about pants though. They are for men.
Comments