The English language is amazing, isn't it?
The rules are understood widely either though their basic nature or the fact that they were stolen from another language and everyone already knows it. And to subvert or break these rules it typically indicative of deeper meaning, rather than simple illiteracy. As the language is so very context dependent, it's easy to tie reference to rules that typically don't apply to a set of sounds, causing drastically different meanings is much shorter phrases.
It's just beautiful how I can construct a message, only for it to be entirely changed when the recipient misses or skims past a single word.
No marriage, ever, has ever had any heart break I’m sure. Sarcasm asides- marriage is full of heart break and potential heartbreak. You’re just having your heart broken by one person. Asides affairs and divorce, there are smaller heartbreaks and disappointments and- if you plan to marry “forever,” then you have the fact that unless you die first and break their heart; your spouse will die someday and your heart will be broken. Two people can date until death do them part as well- there’s no law or rule that makes it so unmarried folks can’t spend a life together. So among many other cliches that put marriage on some pedestal- I’m calling this one false.
If your religion or spirituality makes marriage a personal priority- good for you. In the abstract, it’s a contract between two people that creates legal obligation and grants legal privilege- and/or a symbolic gesture of romance and commitment. That’s it. It has no more special significance beyond what we give it than signing a mortgage or student loan- both of which often last longer than marriage. So do you. Just please be respectful of others and make your intentions known so that everyone has a chance to prevent avoidable heartbreak if one person thinks it’s something it isn’t.
I'm also only 19, you're probably older than me.
The rules are understood widely either though their basic nature or the fact that they were stolen from another language and everyone already knows it. And to subvert or break these rules it typically indicative of deeper meaning, rather than simple illiteracy. As the language is so very context dependent, it's easy to tie reference to rules that typically don't apply to a set of sounds, causing drastically different meanings is much shorter phrases.
It's just beautiful how I can construct a message, only for it to be entirely changed when the recipient misses or skims past a single word.