No drama here, just making jokes. Which (at least speaking for myself anyway) were not aimed at you at all. But if the cap fits...
As for impartiality, no human being alive on Earth is truly impartial. In terms of natural sciences I'd trust a government funded scientist rather than someone paid by Exxon. Similarly, I might not trust a scientist paid by a dictatorial government in questions of political science. It's about which matters they have a stake in. Ultimately, when in doubt you can actually read the studies and assess their credibility by yourself, and you don't always need a background in the subject if you know how to analyze studies. That's the cool thing about the scientific method.
I didn't say they were aimed at anyone, please save your projection projects for school?
.
I said I hope y'all remember this the next time one of you start whining about people bringing shit up on unrelated posts lol
In Czech we have a saying that translates into "The shot goose will always scream the loudest". If you thought our jokes weren't aimed at you, you wouldn't have "screamed" in the first place. So I apologize for any offense caused, and wish you all a good night.
@ewqua Eggshells? So that's what that crunchy noise was. Now why would someone go and throw eggshells around when there's a perfectly good metaphorical mine field?
I guess they really wanted to drive the point home that no ground is truly safe and stuff can crunch or even explode under your feet at any time, when you least expect it.
But idk I'm not an expert in metaphors.
It could've been worse. I mean, we could've made jokes about former president Trump and those boxes of documents with an ironic punchline like "Lock him up" just to spread salt in it.
*crunch crunch crunch*
Maybe they were privately funded scientists. Those have a reportedly sterling reputation when it comes to impartiality.
As for impartiality, no human being alive on Earth is truly impartial. In terms of natural sciences I'd trust a government funded scientist rather than someone paid by Exxon. Similarly, I might not trust a scientist paid by a dictatorial government in questions of political science. It's about which matters they have a stake in. Ultimately, when in doubt you can actually read the studies and assess their credibility by yourself, and you don't always need a background in the subject if you know how to analyze studies. That's the cool thing about the scientific method.
.
I said I hope y'all remember this the next time one of you start whining about people bringing shit up on unrelated posts lol
But idk I'm not an expert in metaphors.
*crunch crunch crunch*