Please, read a science book once

I know of one scientist who is also a Christian, and when asked to explain his job, he simply put it "Science is a way of discovering GOD in detail" or something like that, but the point is, he found a balance between the two.

Guest above is right though.

Yeah,we study in science what God has created. That's what I believe in so you can't say that i'm wrong. Its my own opinion

It is. You are entitled to your opinion. Just like the people disliking you, they want to be respected, but no one else may be.

Well guest, science works with evidence and testing and observation, etc. God can't be analysed in these terms so we can't allege there is a God because there is no proof. Trust me, i'm a scientist. ;)
justkidding

Ok, now stop critisizing people's religion, that's just a new low.

They weren't ”critisizing people's religion", they were stating their opinion (which you yourself have previously said people are entitled to have). Their opinion happens to be that God is scientifically unprovable, with which many would agree.

Which also falls under critisizing people's religion.

No, an opposing opinion is not, in and of itself, a criticism. It is just a different opinion.

No. Just no.
Dissenting opinion, disagreement with your opinion and the ocasionally pointing out your errors IS NOT AN ATTACK on your religion. Neither is not getting your way.

"So we can't allege there is a God because there is no proof" Explain that then.

First of all, get your quote right. They actually said "so we can't allege there is a God because there is no proof." Not truth, PROOF.
Explain it to you? It's obvious, but if you insist - this is someone's opinion. They feel that there is no proof of a God and so do not believe there is one. They're entitled to think this way, and entitled to say so, too.

It was a simple mistake! You are taking this completely wrong also!!

That simple mistake would change the whole meaning of what they had said, so it was an important mistake that needed to be put right.
How am I taking this "completely wrong"? You're the one who stated everyone is entitled to an opinion, yet cannot understand that an opinion different to your own is just different and not a criticism.

I indeed said that. If your opinion is damaging and offensive it's no longer an opinion.

Their opinion - not believing in God - is neither damaging nor offensive.

Just for your information, Sealteam007, even if someone presents something in a "damaging and offensive" way, it can still be an opinion. I can call you a fuck tard: offensive, yes; my opinion, yes.
.
No one was criticizing anything. Criticizing you and your religion would be saying "you are bat shit cray cray for believing in a magic man in the sky." No one said that; they said there is no proof of god (which I agree with by the way). If you're so against this, would you care to share some proven, hard facts that god exists, something beyond just faith and belief that can be justified as proof? Because if so, I would be very interested in hearing it, or reading it in this case.

You are so hypocritical it's unbelieveable.

Do explain.

how is stating the fact that many people believe that there is no proof for God and therefore don't believe that God exists is damaging or offensive?

Same reason as above. Far to many people take dissent as an attack, sometimes a personal one... even when it isn't.

Damn, chill out y'all. I didn't mean to offend anyone and i did not. Peace! :)

i know. I'm saying why what you said shouldn't offend anybody

Big bang

No clue

Well ok.
I'm just asking..