She compromised national security, left Americans to die for no good reason, has been screwing people over for longer than most of her supporters have been alive, as she'll sell out to anyone with the money.
Debatable how?
Americans and allies were under attack.
Now, I don't expect any modern day American politician to load up and fight, but trained badasses were an hour away and ready to help our guys.
Clinton only had to say "go", but she didn't.
I agree with Barney here. Trump is trying to become besties with Putin, and also talks about getting rid of the Geneva conventions and NATO. If Russia and the US put their forces together, I'm afraid they would at least limit NATO's power which is obviously what Putin wants because then he can threaten the rest of Europe. As a Central European, I'm quite afraid of that and would take Clinton over Trump because of her foreign policy. Trump says he wants to "make America great again" but I'm afraid that he'd compromise international relations with the rest of the world (except Russia) while trying to do so. This is not just about the US, this is about the world.
I think Hillary's extremely corrupt and bought by Wall Street, however the email scandal which is her biggest problem right now was more of an oversight/negligence thing than malicious intent. Policy wise, she's better than Trump. His biggest problem is not understanding politics and doing crazy dangerous stuff.
As opposed to electing the most corrupt individual on the planet? Clinton is not a good alternative or choice compared to Trump, and vice versa. The Democratic party has opposed any attempt to give power and rights to it's citizens, and more concerned with activley policing their actions and thoughts than protecting the citizens right to liberty and pursuit of happiness. And saying she's more experienced than Trump is laughable when she says she will go to war with Russia if she has hard evidence that they hacked her emails. She has had a hand in all the policy with what happened with all the wars in the middle east, and has been utterly incompetent in securing peace for the region, mayhap even engineering conflict to profit off of. If you asked the Middle East what president they want, it would be Clinton, and that is why I would not vote for her even on the threat of death.
Yeah, she is way too hawkish and too right wing for a democrat, and very corrupt. But I don't believe she would actually start a war with Russia. She called Putin a warmonger and a bully, to which Putin responded "if she wins the election, it's war!" which is a total emotional overreaction. Putin would be the one starting conflict here, not her (if either of them were actually hotheaded enough to do so, which again would probably come from Putin's side because Hillary is cold and calculating but in any case I don't believe they would actually start a war). But she is way too hooked on Wall Street to dare do something as big as an actual war. I think the most likely scenario here is that she'll be just a bit worse than Obama. But Trump is a wild card so there's a 50% chance he will get just as corrupt and bought by Wall Street (and evidence about his actual wealth implies that it might be so) and a 50% chance he will just go totally crazy and try to deport all Mexicans and Muslims etc.
Thing is, no one likes Trump, and it'll be hard for him to get the other 2 branches of government to do anything he wants. The democrats despise him, and the republicans aren't keen on him being their candidate. If he does become president, he can lead, but he'll be in check. With how the Supreme court is right now, Clinton can select a new justice that is a democrat, and the Democratic party is in the majority in the Senate. If she's elected, it won't be hard for her to push her policies, which are anti-freedom and anti-First AND Second ammendment. She tried to use a loophole in the Constitution to sue an Independent Filmaker who made a movie on her. Democrats are not interested in you keeping your freedom. They are more concerned with ruling you and controlling you.
I read somewhere that she'll appoint a centrist justice so I don't know about that. Yeah, if we went pure policy wise, she'd be better, but both the republican and the democratic party have become a joke. Neither of them are interested in freedom, they just wanna win. Still, Clinton is a bit less crazy than Trump in my opinion, but your point about neither parties liking him and therefore not allowing him to do anything is really good, I haven't thought of it that way before.
I'm glad TN13 brought that up, I've mentioned that to several people. Not only will he be checked, she has dirt on everybody in congress and would be able to ram through anything she wants.
I know I'm kind of late, but can I come to Vietnam also? And if I do, I might have to bring my grandma because she is the only one in the family who speak Vietnamese.
Can someone please inform me without belittling me?
Americans and allies were under attack.
Now, I don't expect any modern day American politician to load up and fight, but trained badasses were an hour away and ready to help our guys.
Clinton only had to say "go", but she didn't.
I think Hillary's extremely corrupt and bought by Wall Street, however the email scandal which is her biggest problem right now was more of an oversight/negligence thing than malicious intent. Policy wise, she's better than Trump. His biggest problem is not understanding politics and doing crazy dangerous stuff.
@barneystinson you remember where I live...? As i have mentioned it a few times here
Cause we don't speak English here at all
Everyone wishes the same...
At least till America can find a 'decent' candidate who is not a criminal or a maniac