She was detained for road rage and arrested for assaulting an officer.
So, the cops chose jailing her over having sex (either with each other or with the other nearby) with a psychotic female who has rage issues, a blatant disregard for the law, attacks people, and who trades sex on a whim with strangers so God knows where she's been or what she has, the end result of such actions being they get an orgasm at the expense of them risking losing their jobs (and possibly any relationships they might be in), AND opening them up to multiple citations and lawsuits.... And they chose poorly because she.... Posts selfies and has big tits? What?
'
And, yes, I am fun at parties <.< ty for asking
I like you. Thank you. And I think you would be fun at parties. People seem to think that just because someone engages in critical analysis of a joke or it’s aubtwxt that they don’t get the humor. I can watch a movie like pacific rim, think it is amazing, enjoy it, really genuinely like it- but then also discuss things like contradictions, inaccuracies, and various faults. The two aren’t mutually exclusive and being able to enjoy a thing on multiple levels allows you all the enjoyment of the superficial level, and then getting to enjoy t again by deconstructing, discussing, and engaging in tangent and related thoughts. So yeah. You’d be fun at parties, more fun than someone who just shouts and does keg stands until they pass out because they are only capable of enjoying things on the level of “WOOOO PARTY!!!”
I have to disagree with you @guest_ with regards to humor. Deconstructing a movie is one thing but what isn’t said in a joke is as important as what is said. Of course the officers made the right choice, everyone knows that and that’s why the second image is funny. Once you start arguing that the second image is wrong it pops that humorous bubble. Let’s say a kid tells you the joke about throwing a clock out of the window to make time fly. If you point out that a clock is only an instrument to measure time and that it would fall rather than fly then you have ruined the atmosphere of humor.
@scatmandingo- But most jokes are a moment. If they aren’t doing a set, or you aren’t doing rows where you trade jokes, the punchline hits, you laugh or smirk, maybe if it was really good you think of it and laugh through the day. Some jokes you get over, but are never done with. I still laugh watching some movies for the 50th time. But in between viewing I am not laughing constantly for years on the same joke. The impact generally fades with time, and many jokes become funny again after you haven’t heard them for awhile. But on that first telling, there is a window of enjoyment after which- what do you do? Sit there for 10 minutes saying “man, remember that joke you told? It was so funny.” Back and forth? You either laugh and move on, or find something to converse about. To your example- if someone told me a joke about a ship traveling at light speed- it might be interesting to focus on the details and try and puzzle out the physics or math, or to postulate on inconsistencies.
It can start other discussions and then you have possibly hours of enjoyment instead of seconds or minutes. Of course, everyone enjoys things differently and I don’t seek to invalidate how you enjoy things, but not everyone does the same. It’s also worth mentioning that while a meme is often a sort of joke or re imagining of a joke, the format itself is not quite the same. You tend to not be in the room with the teller or the audience and may “hear” the joke hours or years after it is said and without context. People also tend to consume memes en masse at a rate and in ways jokes usually aren’t- even stand up shows don’t tend to alternate each joke between multiple comedians and styles in turns. And we live in an age where some people are so extreme that their serious opinions play as satire and vice versa, where common sense, intelligence, cultural touchstones etc. can’t be taken for granted, and all types of media are used subversively, so it doesn’t hurt to think critically.
@guest_ thank you for that. :) I wasn't truly feeling concerned about people finding me fun at parties (I honestly tend not to enjoy parties anyway), but I still appreciate you saying that. Fortunately or unfortunately I tend to be a chronic overthinker, so I pretty much critically deconstruct everything to some degree... much to the chagrin of people around me some of the time. <.< Even if it's something I'm enjoying I tend to be going "that wouldn't REALLY work..." probably why I'm often a fan of things like CinemaSins, and reading your comments.
'
I also can't help but find it amusing that we're critically deconstructing a joke I made about critically deconstructing a joke someone else made
@guest_ there are many instances of a humorous post on this site inspiring a continuation and elaboration of the joke in the comments. When it goes well the people start to feed off each other’s humor and it gets far better than the original post. When I look in the comments that’s what I’m always hoping to find. While I understand decomposing a joke can lead to intellectual discourse I personally much prefer trying to maintain the humor and seeing how far it can be taken.
@xvarnah- lol. I didn’t think you were serious, but I still find the deconstruction of deconstruction funny on a couple levels. I just figured I’d throw it out there because I know sometimes people like to get negative whenever a person makes observations on a post that go against their expectations. Overthinking is a blessing and a curse for sure. Where the luxury of time allows it can be fun mental exercise (or mental play,) so long as we are careful not to self sabotage through finding the imaginary bad in life or through paralyzing indecisiveness. My opinion anyway. But I enjoy your comments, as much as I can’t recall reading a comment from you that I didn’t enjoy or at least find to be intelligent even if I didn’t agree.
@scatmandingo- that’s certainly a valid approach as well. I enjoy that too time to time depending on mood, content, etc. There’s enough bandwidth for everyone to discuss a post however best suits them, and one could simultaneously even be replying to a comment thread deconstructing a joke while in the same posts comments be participating in a thread making a continuous elaboration on the same joke.
@xvaranah makes good points. Beyond that I had a few thoughts myself. Puttinga sodes morality, legality- that endangering a stable and rewarding career and risking jail time is something that little if any sex will ever be worth, putting asides that for a few minutes to a few hours of fun you risk ruining your life, or that some guys just aren’t into 2 guy 3 ways and they could be married, gay, etc.... life advice... some times the best looking people are the worst lays of your life. Especially ones who’s craft is on image. You often find very image conscious people are primarily self absorbed- already a bad trait in a sex partner. But more so be it a stripper/model or some dude who is enormously hung- people like that often think they don’t need to do any work. They’re often used to looks or a particular attribute getting them all they want, and rely on the fact that those attributes will satisfy a partner and so often don’t develop other skills as much or feel the need to exert...
... effort because “you’re probably thrilled” and “lucky” just to be with them. Many men climax quickly with very attractive women just because they are attractive, so she doesn’t need to do anything except let you finish, and many men who are well endowed and attractive feel like that’s what sex is about, and they always finish so you’re just there for the ride. I’m not saying that “pro level” attractive people are always self centers or that they are all bad in bed or that they can’t be good if they actually try- I’m saying that by the numbers and in my own as well as combined anecdotal experience- people who are good looking enough to make a living off of it in that “sex symbol” way tend to fall more into the disappointing lay category. Given the choice I’ll go for “uncommonly attractive” over “looks like photoshop in real life” not just because I know what it’s like dealing with their routines, but because the realistically attractive person is more likely to genuinely be in to it.
Because they have standards? For Police Officers I bet a pretty normal standard would be to not have sex with a criminal. Right up there with not having sex with a criminal, while on the job, and wearing their uniform. I mean to me it's just insulting. I don't care what your milkbags look like if we're in this position there are waaaaaay better choices out there.
So, the cops chose jailing her over having sex (either with each other or with the other nearby) with a psychotic female who has rage issues, a blatant disregard for the law, attacks people, and who trades sex on a whim with strangers so God knows where she's been or what she has, the end result of such actions being they get an orgasm at the expense of them risking losing their jobs (and possibly any relationships they might be in), AND opening them up to multiple citations and lawsuits.... And they chose poorly because she.... Posts selfies and has big tits? What?
'
And, yes, I am fun at parties <.< ty for asking
'
I also can't help but find it amusing that we're critically deconstructing a joke I made about critically deconstructing a joke someone else made