Think of it like this. You have two sandwiches on a table, and you're pretty hungry. Are you gonna eat the regular sandwich on the left, or are you gonna eat the sandwich on the right that someone has fucked?
Uh captain do you know heterosexual people also have sex? It's us ace who tend not to.
You can argue that you did not say "sandwich who fucked" but "sandwich who got fucked", which raises the question: (not talking about weird ass kinks) is it really better to eat a sandwich that has been in someone's genitals?
.
I think (but I may be wrong?) that it was an aids joke coming from when we thought gay people were more prone to getting it.
The point I'm making is that vampires prefer virgins for food, because they don't want to consume something someone else fucked. In the situation here, he realizes he may have done so. You too would probably feel disgusted if you ate, say a pumpkin pie, only to realize that someone had cut a hole in the pumpkin used, and had sex with it. It's not about gender, it's about your food having been fucked.
I love that the only way Jackharkness could justify his stance is by using a completely fictional character, or a mostly fictitious sandwhich scenario.
Here's reality: people are neither sandwiches, nor bloodbags for anyone to feast on. People are, however, valuable for their thoughts, strength of character, how well they treat others, etc. Their sexual history or sexual orientation provide no reasonable measure to the value of their character.
I was trying to explain what I had thought the joke was about, and apparently I had misread it. My mind went to a joke involving vampires that I had heard before, and I was trying to reuse said joke, and somehow it turned into this whole long winded, drawn out, speech about people and sexual orientation.
Yeah, idk why people are going after the Captain. I still don't bloody well GET the joke, but even I know Jack was just trying to muddle through the possible meaning.
I'm honestly getting so sick and tired of seeing racist and now homophobic jokes. I have been coming here for years and honestly, I don't see myself continuing if this trend hold up.
I think promoting these kinds of thoughts is absolutely disgusting.
You can argue that you did not say "sandwich who fucked" but "sandwich who got fucked", which raises the question: (not talking about weird ass kinks) is it really better to eat a sandwich that has been in someone's genitals?
.
I think (but I may be wrong?) that it was an aids joke coming from when we thought gay people were more prone to getting it.
Here's reality: people are neither sandwiches, nor bloodbags for anyone to feast on. People are, however, valuable for their thoughts, strength of character, how well they treat others, etc. Their sexual history or sexual orientation provide no reasonable measure to the value of their character.
I think promoting these kinds of thoughts is absolutely disgusting.