Since meerkats are usually fine with people, they have short walls (about 1.5-2 feet on their enclosures and occasionally get dead trees to climb. My thought is this kid leaned over the wall
Fortunately we still have Bokito in our midst. He escaped from his enclosure, furiously attacking a woman who had been repeatedly provoking him, after being warned no to. but Bokito didn't suffer any consequences except wooziness from the tranq dart.
Yes yes, give jail time to what's probably a 5-9 year old kid for having good twitch reaction instincts. The zoo should have moved the mama one out from where there was any chance of human physical contact and should have been more firm with the customers about the rules. The school staff should have been more attentive and the little shit himself should have listened to the people telling him not to fuck with the poor little animal.
So if someone who’s being murdered and they say no, the murderer is just supposed to get to walk away if they do stop and then they die anyways due to injuries substained during the attack. In the long arm of the law if he was being prosecuted in the US: Destruction of Property, Breaking and Entering and Criminal Trespass.
1 it's Hungary
2 the animal attacked him and he reacted. The zoo is lucky if his parents don't sue. Any place that expects to have children or adult bodied children should expect to have their rules broken and take precautions. Even in the US if someone gets bitten by an animal and the animal dies as a result as long as the person was not abusing the animal (attempting to pet the animal would be a very very hard thing to convince a court is abuse) there's no DA that would even consider taking the case.
Edit: also he was allowed on the property. It's a zoo and it was a field trip. There's no way he'd get got on trespassing nor breaking and entering. He most likely leaned over a railing. There's no law against that.
10
·
Edited 6 years ago
deleted
· 6 years ago
I think we should get someone to slam the boy to the ground to make it fair.
It still died even though he was warned not to, if he’s a child or not. Look at Armajeet Sada, he’s a serial killer at age 8. He deserves to be punished, hard. He was told not to do what he did, an animal died because of this action, and you just want him to get away with it because he’s young. @bethorien, while yes, it’s not the US, there are still chargeable offenses relegating to the death of the meerkat and her unborn fetuses. Destroying property is illegal wherever, and don’t give me the suing of the zoo malarkey, the Zoo should sue the parents of the child because now they’re down an animal due to incompetence. JUST MY PIECE.
Actually there is a very good case petting could be considered abuse. It's a wild animal, it's not psychic to some random kid's intention; attempting to pet it could easily be taken by the animal as a blatant threat; as it was. As the kid was warned multiple times not to do it, and still did it, he had to understand at some level he was threatening the animal; intentional abuse.
Tonight we drink for Zara. She died protecting her babies. She and her children died the good death and for that we shall not mourn but rejoice for those that die the good death shall forever dine in the halls of Valhalla.
I'd assume the school and the parents would punish the kid. Detention, lose of field trip privileges, probably heavily grounded, hopefully put into counseling cause all children should be anyways.
The kid won't get punished. And he didn't wanted to pet Zara. He was poking and annoying her with a stick and was told several times to let her be. Zara was expecting 2 babies and when she had enough she bit the kid. The kid threw her to the ground and they went on their business. The manager of the zoo had to run after them to ask what have happened. The father of this little ass tries to play the victim card. The kid feels nothing about what he has done to the poor little meerkat. I live in Kecskemét so I had the luck to meet with Zara many times and she was very calm, cute and was always happy to see people. If someone walked up to their enclosure she immidiately ran to them to greet them. The kid won't get anything for it because his parents are stupid and his is their "little angel".
Who's first instinct is to slam something that just bit you? I can understand hitting or kicking to defend yourself, but to actively pick it up and slam it so hard that it dies, that fucking kid is sociopathic
I think he may have panicked and shook his arm in a way to fling it towards the ground. The article is just trying to use provocative language to demonize the brat.
He was told not to pet the animal and in his attempt to pet said animal he got bit. His instincts functioning correctly caused him to fling the animal bitting him downward killing it. The kid is guilty of being a spoiled little shit who can't accept not getting what he wanted. The zoo is guilty of not having better protocol for moving a pregnant animal away from a containment in which contact is physically possible. The school is guilty of of not sending enough adults to watch the students or sending inattentive adults who can't notice zoo staff telling one of their students not to do something.
He hulk tossed her to the ground. He was annoying her with a stick and was told to let her be. I just can't understand why the teacher didn't pulled him away.
Apparently veiling exasperation and mild disgust at the prospect of beating a child using a cooking terminology to insinuate the fact that a child that's beaten is neither well nor moderately well parented goes right over people's heads. How interesting. What do you make of this Ew? Also yes there's absolutely no way I'm having children unless it's eating a dead one to survive.
Well my already pretty high level of happiness has been raised. You did a good. Also why is your go to child flavor enhancer ketchup? People would probably go well with a pinch garlic and pepper plus since it's a child it would probably be more tender meat than on an adult so baked and lemon tang would be nice probably.
But why would you want something that tastes like hotdogs when you could have something that tastes like a baked slab of deer meat with nice flavor bits added?
I'm not saying they aren't good I'm saying that they aren't something that's a carnival sorta thing. They are at carnivals but are much more a baseball game food than a carnival food. Hell there's even are carnival brand corndogs and ballpark brand hot dogs.
Who the heck is letting this kid lean over the fence and letting him be within reaching distance? Terrible. Also, kids need to be taught that they can't do whatever they want. I would never, in a billion years, no matter how old i was, think that I would be entitled to putting my hand in an animal's cage at a zoo (unless it was a touch tank or something like that) since i figured the animals didn't know who i was etc. God this pisses me off
2 the animal attacked him and he reacted. The zoo is lucky if his parents don't sue. Any place that expects to have children or adult bodied children should expect to have their rules broken and take precautions. Even in the US if someone gets bitten by an animal and the animal dies as a result as long as the person was not abusing the animal (attempting to pet the animal would be a very very hard thing to convince a court is abuse) there's no DA that would even consider taking the case.
Edit: also he was allowed on the property. It's a zoo and it was a field trip. There's no way he'd get got on trespassing nor breaking and entering. He most likely leaned over a railing. There's no law against that.
Edit: Goin and editin ya post in the time I type a question.
maybe I'm in the mood for carnival food
i actually discussed this irl
poor animal didnt have to die because of a stupid ass kid
i hope the kid befalls the same fate