No?
We’re just saying a partnership is when there’s romance, like love and affection and desire for being a couple, and a friendship is a bond without that, just friends. For love and affection, sex isn’t needed
I just know that for many people, for all of their entire lives up until we started making up new terms for everything, they had or currently have friendships that are on this level, and I think it kind of undermines those relationships by saying it's a lesser version. I get what they're implying, but (and I'll use a page from the opponents' playbook), I'm a little offended. "Hey, this is my friend John. We've live together and have been besties since we were 4. We do everything together! I love this guy, he's great." "Oh...you're in a 'friendship' with John? That's nice. This is my Partner. We're in a queerplatonic relationship. It's like what you have, but more. You couldn't fathom our connection. I can't see if you're still standing there because I'm looking down on you so far, I'm facing straight up."
It’s called queerplatonic because the importance of the relationship is different, or queer. So it just seems like friendship, but one considers the other a bigger and more important part of their life and dedicated the same amount as one would with a marriage or the like. I don’t see anything wrong with having a specific definition for it. Saying “we have a queerplatonic relationship” describes the relationship without the person having to say “we’re friends but really good, friendship is our main goal/priority in life in the way a marriage would be”.
So would Alan and Walden in Two and a Half Men be an example of a queerplatonic relationship? Because besides the adopted kid and getting married, I've lived with most of my closest friends at one point or another and let a few mooch.
yep, literally just friendship.I have a bunch of friends at my school and my church and they all fit this bill. but it's not queerplatonic because thats just a word made up by a tumblr professor so they would be allowed to march in the pride parade.
The English language tends to have a lot of synonyms. But even though a word has very similar meaning- the impact is not the same: Frightened, Scared, Terrified, Alarmed, Worried, Nervous, Panicky, Intimidated, etc. are examples of synonyms for the same emotion. However- in (American English) usage it is not common to say after a plane crash: “I was alarmed that we would all die..” or how about: “I’m Nervous of the dark.” “The economy has me intimidated...” even saying “That was scary” is less intense than “that was terrifying.” We have many words to express subtle differences in tone. It’s funny we can have so many words for “big” or “happy” which so many accept- yet when we try to expand our vocabulary on gender, sexuality, or other generalizations about human beings, so many balk. Humans, arguably highly complex and varied, and our relationships- as complex if not more so than an emotion like happiness- yet we have so few words to differentiate the bonds between us.
For those above a passing acquaintance, but below a friend, but not a colleague or a peer- what are they? An associate? What if that term is too sterile or vague? There is so much in relationships that is not expressed by “friend,” or “close friend” “good friend” “best friend.” Even words like “brother/sister” have had to be repurposed because we lack proper words to define a non familial bond of the perceived depth of the relationship. At that, these words can mean different things to different people. Some people call multiple people their “best friend”- which the title “best” already defines that they are above all others- it is singular. Some people call anyone a best friend or a good friend, some call those they barely truly know “brother/sister,” largely because we don’t have an appropriate word for a person you feel a very strong connection to but don’t know well or have much time spent with. People are quick to poo poo or dismiss “word politics” but what about precision...
... of language? When I see people mock or deride such usuals of novel language to define relationships I can’t help but picture in my mind some hardly literate sole laughing at someone because they use “fancy words” like “Enormous” or “Putrid” or “Destitute” or “Verisimilitude.” If you lack the ability to learn new words, or simply don’t care to increase your vocabulary (another fancy word for talking or writing ability..) that is your business. But Society at large and the English Language evolves its vocabulary as the times require. At the very least certain subcultures have always had their own words, phrases, and idiosyncrasies of communication. If nothing else it’s no different than slang like “Cool” “Tight” “Sick” “Fresh” “Ill” and so on- no one is requiring you to learn slang words, but not doing so can disadvantage you, especially if and when such words gain wider use and cross your path. But lots of people out of touch with cultural zeitgeist would not understand many words.
We’re just saying a partnership is when there’s romance, like love and affection and desire for being a couple, and a friendship is a bond without that, just friends. For love and affection, sex isn’t needed