Absolutely not. It will cause damage and block up your intestines for one, but it’s also difficult to eat for not much flavour, eating the rind just doesn’t benefit
1: Squiggles are curvy. Letters have a lot of sharp edges and cannot be classified as squiggles.
2: Hallucinations involve one or more of your senses. The imagination from reading is fully contained within the brain and does not quite count as hallucinating.
However, if you said reading is just staring at symbols and seeing/hearing things without seeing/hearing them, that would be completely accurate.
How would the rudeness of a customer be determined? If it was just the workers who determine it, mean retail workers would probably start charging everyone extra for fun.
Well, mean would qualify as getting cussed at because the customer put the wrong pin code into a gas pump at two am, then accused me of fuckery when I was nowhere near my terminal, not that I have some magic 'reject card' button anyhow. Besides you don't last long in retail with a shit personality, the only reason I'm still working where I do is because I'm the only one that will work nights, the others are 'too scared' or 'can't stay awake' or 'have kids' (like I effing don't have a kid or something!)
Well... it all depends. Cheesesteak, Hoagies, and “subs” are all commonly served on rolls. The USDA legal definition of a sandwich extends to things such as “inside a biscuit” and hotdogs are classified by the USDA under sandwiches for inspection. California and New York BOTH legally consider hot dogs sandwiches- but New York also considers a buttered bagel or a burrito or Pita a sandwich- while other states have ruled burritos are NOT sandwiches, and the USDA considers burritos “sandwich like foods.”
To complicate the matter you have “open face” sandwiches, which by their nature have a single piece of bread. Webster’s definition includes hot dogs and Webster’s has gone on record that a hot dog IS a sandwich- however this too can be debated since the dictionary standard is the reference for language, however the dictionary changes to reflect language and thus a hot dog isn’t a sandwich because the dictionary says so unless the popular usage is such- if popular usage for sandwich doesn’t include hot dogs the dictionary must change to reflect language and not the other way around. That’s a slippery slope though itself.
Hamburgers are served on “buns” and are technically and legally identified as “hamburger sandwiches.” One can easily and accidentally split a hot dog bun which is joined, and hot dogs are often served on pre split rolls, buns, or even bread. So even IF we accept that a singular bun makes a hot dog a non sandwich- that doesn’t apply to all hot dogs.
Therefore, on consideration- I would have to say the most diplomatic and accurate common use definition of a hot dog would depend upon the individual dog and it’s preparation and presentation. We cannot rely on legal definitions. The USDA for example oversees meat- meaning it cannot rule on the bun or bread with jurisdiction. It treats a good where meat touches bread as a sandwich from the perspective of cross contamination in concern to meat because it is a meat organization.
The legal bodies of various states are primarily concerned with what is a sandwich for tax and other purposes- so their classifications reflect an intent to prevent tax evasion or other use of “fraud” such as the selling of a “sandwich” where the bread hasn’t been completely sliced upon delivery to a customer- but can be easily done with the hands- which would then avoid hot sandwich taxes for example. We can’t use the dictionary exclusively either as discussed. So for a definitive ruling- if we factor all we have together- HOW the dog is served matters. The dog itself is a type of sausage without the bread- so it CAN be used to make a sandwich like any other meat or sausage. Is a “hot dog” you are served in a “bun” a sandwich? I guess that depends.
2: Hallucinations involve one or more of your senses. The imagination from reading is fully contained within the brain and does not quite count as hallucinating.
However, if you said reading is just staring at symbols and seeing/hearing things without seeing/hearing them, that would be completely accurate.